pf_03357 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

1 Excerpt of Minutes of Planning Commission meeting of January 2, 2002: 2 3 a. Planning File 3357: Request by Stoney River Development (Brent 4 Thompson) to consider a Planned Unit Development allowing eight single-family 5 residential lots on the 2.25-acre parcel located at 495 lona Lane. 6 7 Chair Rhody opened the hearing and asked Thomas Paschke, City Planner, to 8 provide background on the proposed Preliminary Plat and Concept Stage of a 9 Planned Unit Development. 10 11 Brent Thompson, (Stoney River Development) requested consideration of the 12 Preliminary Plat and a General Concept approval for a Planned Unit 13 Development (Section 1008.lOC) of the Roseville City Code. 14 15 The proposal seeks approval to subdivide the 2.25-acre parcel at 495 lona Lane 16 into an eight lot residential development with 8 single-family, owner occupied, 17 detached structures. The proposal will slightly increase lot and house density on 18 the 2.5 parcel from that which is allowed under Section 1004.02D5 of the 19 Roseville City Code. 20 21 Community Development staff recommended approval of the preliminary plat 22 and concept plan for the Planned Unit Development. 23 24 Mr. Tom Walsh, 454 lona Lane, stated that the eight-house plan was acceptable, 25 and that it may be more acceptable as a seven-house development, allowing more 26 setback between units. By reducing to seven the development would have fewer 27 vehicles and traffic, and the units will be further apart, reducing fire hazards. 28 29 Member Mulder asked for the scale of the units (ramblers with 1,500 - 1,800 s.f. 30 per first finished floors per unit). How large will the building area be? (2,100 _ 31 2,200 s.f.). How many will be walkout units (six units). 32 33 Member Olson asked what the elevation notation on the plan represented (floor 34 elevation at first floor and lower level floor). 35 36 Member Mulder asked for total impervious surface (22-23%). Member Mulder 37 asked for ponding details. Deb Bloom reported that staff is working with Grass 38 Lake Watershed. There is adequate size and area for stonn water storage. 39 40 Member Wilke asked for details of water running to the south (Water will be 41 conveyed to ponds, then to Lake Owasso). 42 43 Troy Duncan asked for comparison of six unit to eight unit preliminary plat 44 approvals. Thomas Paschke explained added requirements of the Planned Unit 45 Development. Is there an incremental difference between six large houses and 46 eight smaller houses (Staff estimates similar numbers). Deb Bloom noted that 47 the City assumes a 25% impervious coverage of the site. 48 49 Member Mulder asked what staff and developer requirements would be 50 completed prior to Council review approval (grading, drainage, tree preservation 51 and landscaping and tenns and conditions of the PUD). When Council gets the