Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2.13 The County Assessor's market valuation of housing (not sales value which may be up to <br />20% more) in the neighborhood (27 homes) ranges from $102,100 to $186,700. The <br />higher values were to the east and southeast. Hills Courte South values, adjoining to the <br />northwest, range from $357,000 to $465,600 because of newer age and larger size. <br /> <br />3.0 STAFF COMMENTS and FINDINGS: <br /> <br />3.1 On December 20, 2001, Stoney River Development held a neighborhood meeting to <br />discuss the proposed eight lot planned unit development. At the meeting area residents <br />presented similar questions to those voiced at the Planning Commission meeting of <br />December 12,2001 regarding tree preservation, parcel grading/drainage, and house <br />size/style. (The applicant may wish to explain in detail his perceptions of the issues.) <br /> <br />3.2 The land use - eight, single family detached, owner occupied housing units is consistent <br />with the Comprehensive Plan designation for the area and is consistent with the Zoning <br />Code density of 4 units per acre. There appears to be a need for this type of low <br />maintenance, smaller housing unit, which is more consistent with the rambler <br />architecture of the surrounding lots. <br /> <br />3.3 The proposed street design dedicating 50-feet of right-of-way for a roadway and 100 feet <br />of right-of-way for a cul-de-sac (turn-around), and developing a 28-foot wide street with <br />an 80-foot wide cul-de-sac is consistent with the City Code. A 28-foot wide pavement <br />allows for parking on one side, if driveways do not interfere. Staff is investigating the <br />possibility of shared driveways and a planting and snow storage island within the cul-de- <br />sac. <br /> <br />3.4 The proposed grading and drainage plan must be reviewed and approved by the Roseville <br />Engineering Department to ensure consistency with the Grass Lake and Roseville storm <br />water management plans prior to final Council approval. A utility and drainage easement <br />is required around the periphery and must ten-feet in width (where no matching easement <br />is available). The developer will also need to work with the Public Works Department to <br />determine the final use for the existing utility stubs that lie along the west of the parcel. <br />Public Works will also check for outstanding assessments and how they will be split <br />among the proposed eight lots. <br /> <br />3.5 Prior to final Council approval of a PUD, a tree preservation plan must be developed with <br />the assistance of the City to preserve those trees deemed appropriate adjacent to the <br />proposed street right-of-way and adjacent the periphery (north, east and west) of the <br />parcel. <br /> <br />3.6 The proposed PUD must include a landscape plan that includes street trees, and other <br />landscaping that augments existing vegetation on the parcel. The plan must be reviewed <br />and approved by the City's landscape architect. <br /> <br />3.7 Park dedication for the eight-lot development is required and must be in the form of a <br />cash payment in lieu of land dedication amounting to $500.00 per lot or $4,000.00. <br />According to the City Park System Plan no further land is required in this area. The <br />contribution will be added to the park redevelopment fund for the benefit of all city users. <br /> <br />PF3357 - RPCA PUD Concept 010202 Page 3 <br />