My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03359
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3300
>
pf_03359
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 1:54:26 PM
Creation date
5/13/2005 3:07:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3359
Planning Files - Type
Rezoning
Address
Twin Lakes
Project Name
Twin Lakes
Applicant
City of Roseville
Status
Denied
Date Final City Council Action
10/21/2002
Date Final Planning Commission Action
10/2/2002
Additional Information
Twin Lakes Rezoned to B-6, Mixed Use Business Park District
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />1.4 A "Mixed Use Business Park District" is normally a redevelopment area, in which the <br />environmental impacts of a business park have been analyzed through an environmental <br />impact statement or similar review process. The impacts are then mitigated within the <br />requirements a Planned Unit Development as defined in Section 1008. All parcels should <br />have well-planned roads, pathways, utilities, ponding and communication systems. <br />Parcels within a "Mixed Use Business Park" should provide access to an internal parkway <br />and/or external County minor arterials as well as convenient access to the Interstate <br />Highway System. <br /> <br />1.5 A "Mixed Use Business Park District" should create a unique, safe and high-quality <br />work, housing, and recreational neighborhood environment by installing extraordinary <br />architecturally distinct buildings, parkways, transit and transportation services, site <br />planning, landscaping, parks, pedestrian pathways, and lighting. <br /> <br />1.6 As currently envisioned, in single occupant buildings, pre-existing, "non conforming" <br />uses are allowed to continue their operations within a "B-6" or any other zoning district. <br />However, if a use is removed or closed for more than one year, only permitted uses in the <br />zoning district are allowed to remain or expand. The intent of this (state) provision is to <br />protect the current uses and value of the pre-existing, nonconforming structures, but to <br />gradually see them evolve into other permitted or redeveloped uses and structures. This <br />provision allows the City's Twin Lakes Redevelopment Plan to occur with the assurance <br />that redevelopment and major reinvestment of new uses and adjacent uses will be healthy, <br />safe, attractive, and good investments in an "area' of similar uses. Re-establishing, <br />expanding, or intensifying the pre-existing nonconforming single occupant use (after it <br />has been vacant for a year) is counter-productive to the adopted Twin Lakes <br />Redevelopment Plan; it will be difficult to entice the significant private investment <br />required by the Twin Lakes Plan with no assurance that land use controls cannot prevent <br />the long term intense, non conforming uses to remain and expand. <br /> <br />1. 7 In multi-tenant buildings the situation becomes more complex. Allowing the pre-existing <br />nonconforming uses inside the existing building shell (or even expand into additional <br />existing leaseable or subleased bays) is an acceptable interpretation of Roseville's Code <br />Two conditions are paramount: 1) only within the existing building shell and 2) without <br />intensifying negative environmental impacts such as exterior noise, fumes, light, and <br />truck traffic. <br /> <br />2.0 SITE CONDITIONS EXAMPLES: <br />(see attached maps and diagrams from August, 2002) <br /> <br />The owners have demonstrated concern for the declining value of older, existing <br />buildings in a slow economy, especially when buildings are only partially leased. From <br />the owners' perspective a steady cash flow demonstrates building value. It is better at this <br />time to have these buildings fully leased during their useful life with conforming (or non- <br />conforming uses), waiting for a later strong market to redevelop as the older buildings <br />either fail or lose market acceptance. Long term (estimate 15 years), the owners are <br />supportive of the Twin Lakes Plan. However, being fully leased in today's slow market <br />simply requires being as flexible as possible (with minimal city review time) to accept <br />PF3359-RCA(102102) Page 4 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.