My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03359
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3300
>
pf_03359
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 1:54:26 PM
Creation date
5/13/2005 3:07:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3359
Planning Files - Type
Rezoning
Address
Twin Lakes
Project Name
Twin Lakes
Applicant
City of Roseville
Status
Denied
Date Final City Council Action
10/21/2002
Date Final Planning Commission Action
10/2/2002
Additional Information
Twin Lakes Rezoned to B-6, Mixed Use Business Park District
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />TWIN LAKES BACKGROUND REPORT 00/21/02) <br /> <br />REQUEST: <br /> <br />Property owners, N orthco Real Estate, St Paul Properties, Hagen, and Reco/Regan <br />have requested that the City Council/Planning Commission discuss the merits of <br />either: <br />1) not rezoning any Twin Lakes land to B-6 until a redevelopment proposal is <br />in hand, or <br /> <br />2) expanding the "pre-existing, nonconforming use" text definition and <br />exceptions for their land uses and buildings within the proposed Twin Lakes <br />"B-6" rezoning area. <br /> <br />The applicants' purpose would be to allow "pre-existing, nonconforming lots, uses <br />and structures" to expand, intensify, or change to another "nonconforming" use in <br />order to stabilize the lease and cash flow as well as retain or expand existing and <br />new tenants. <br /> <br />In July 2002, the City Council requested that the Planning Commission review the <br />case and provide further recommendations regarding the ''pre-existing non <br />conforming lots, uses and structures". Since July the applicants have been working <br />with staff and the City Attorney to develop more explicit language dealing with the <br />"non-conforming use" issue. At the same time they have pointed out other areas in the <br />ordinance where clarification was necessary. Attached are their proposals. <br /> <br />1.0 BACKGROUND: <br /> <br />1.1 In September of 200 1, the City of Roseville established in its Comprehensive Plan a <br />"Business Park" designation. The Twin Lakes Business Park Master Plan was approved <br />with that designation. On October 24,2001, the Metropolitan Council approved the <br />designation of "Business Park" within the Twin Lakes Master Plan Amendment to the <br />City of Roseville Comprehensive Plan. The Commission formally reviewed this item on <br />November 14, 2001. <br /> <br />1.2 During the fall of 2001 the Community Development Department reviewed the Roseville <br />Zoning Ordinance to determine whether it was preferable to create a separate zoning <br />district for Twin Lakes or revise the existing district. The staff concluded that the <br />existing (at that time) B-6, Office Park District could be amended with the new language <br />consistent with a mixed-use business park such as Twin Lakes. <br /> <br />1.3 A "Mixed Use Business Park District" is defined as a geographically identifiable area <br />which contains a consistent architectural mix of office, office-laboratory, office- <br />showroom-warehousing, bio-technical, biomedical, high-tech software and hardware <br />production uses with support services such as limited or specialized retail, health, fitness, <br />lodging and multifamily housing. Most of these uses can be connected by pedestrian way <br />as well as roadway. <br /> <br />PF3359-RCA(102102) Page 3 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.