pf_03359 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

4.0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Planning staff recommends "Option 3.2e", making no changes at this time to the text or the map, recognizing that the development and leasing market is in a slow period, and that this area (Twin Lakes) might best be served by having each proposal for a parcel or group of parcels heard, reviewed, and decided upon individually in the future by each developer and/or the city. Staff also recommends preparation of an additional policy document that more clearly explains the pre-existing, nonconforming building and land use review procedure. 5.0 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: 1. Table until November 4, 2002, any Planning Commission recommendation on language changes to the B-6 zoning district, instructing the City Attorney and staff to retain the existing pre-existing, nonconformity language, and request the City Attorney and staff to prepare specific clarification language for Section 1005.07 A and B regarding "permitted uses and ancillary uses". 2. Recommend to the Council to table indefinitely the City's proposal to rezone all Twin Lakes parcels from 1-1,1-2, and B-1 and B-4 to B-6, thus allowing for individual parcel-by parcel "B-6" rezoning requests consistent with the Twin Lakes Master Plan as amended and current at the time of the rezoning request. 3. Request the staff to develop a policy document which explains the pre-existing, nonconforming building and land use review procedure. 6.0 SUGGESTION COUNCIL ACTION: By motion, deny the request by the City of Roseville to rezone the Twin Lakes area (change the zoning map) as described in the proposed ordinance (attached) from B- 1, B-4, 1-1 and 1-2 to B-6 Mixed Use Business Park, in order to allow individual property owners to come forth with proposed rezoning, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, at a future time. Prepared by: Thomas Paschke (490-2236) and Dennis Welsch (490-2232) Attachment: Proposed Ordinance. 60-day review not applicable. PF3359-RCA(1 02102) Page 6 of 13