pf_03368 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

. ... CASE NUMBER: APPLlCAtlT: 1586-85 Yor'kton Limi ted Page 3 most appropriately on the south side of the southerly most unit (contiguous to Trunk Highway 36). We doubt, however', that such additional spaces will be needed. 7. At the northwest corner of the site, a 6,900 square foot day care center is proposed. The day care center is a special use in either an R-1 or R-3 District. The applicants are now negotiating with a potential operator for the day care center. These negotiations may be completed prior to the Planning Commission hearing. Space is provided for a turn around facility for the delivery and pick-up of children at the site with access off the privat(~ street, rather than Lexington Avenue or Grandview Avenue. It is hoped that the r'elationship between the day care center and the elderly housing facilities will be a good one allowing for some interaction between the two. 8. A 9,280 square foot office building is proposed on a 0.91 acre site at the southwest corner of the property. This land is now occupied by two single family homes, both of which have been purchased by the applicant. One of the homes, however, was purchased with a life occupancy contingency and thus, that site will not be developed .lmrned ia tely. Inasr.Juch as this site is indicated as high density multi-family housing on the Comprehensive Plan, it will be necessary to amend the Comprehensive Plan to indicate it as a Limited Business area prior to any zoning action taking place on this site. The proposal is to rezone the land from R-1 to B-1. The applicant indicates his intent to have the structure occupied by medical offices. Such services might well be helpful to the contiguous senior citizen housing occupants and the Rose of Sharon nursing home resident,') further to the east. Access to this property will be off the private street system, thus minimizing impact on Lexington Avenue. The parking indicated for this site totals 41 spaces but should in fact be 45 spaces. We suggest that t:1e site plan can be adjusted to accommodate the additional four parking spaces. 9. A rE~oning from R-1 to R-3 is proposed for the northerly 110 feet of this sl te, up to the south right-of-way line of Grandvicw Avenue. The right-of-way for Grandview has previously been dedicated though the roadway itself is constructed primarily on the northerly half of the right-of-way. This was done because at the time the roadway was built, only half of the right-of-way was dedicated. Your staff engineer suggests that it may be appropriate to rebuild Grandview Avenue at this time, in which case the