Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
<br />5.2 Section 1004.0lA5 (Overall Area) restricts the Lichtscheidl accessory building to the <br />maximum size of the principal structure footprint or 1,060 square feet. <br /> <br />5.3 Section 1004.0lA6 (Maximum Total Surface Area) restricts the Lichtscheidl parcel to a <br />maximum impervious area of 30% or 11,290 square feet. The proposal would create a <br />total impervious coverage of 3,412 square feet, well below the parcel allowance. <br /> <br />5.4 Section 1004.0lA4 (Requirements for Increased Size) describes the criteria under which <br />a CUP must be evaluated by the Planning Commission and City Council. The criteria are <br />as follows: impact of parking; impact on parks, streets, and other public facilities; <br />compatibility of site plan, internal traffic circulation, landscaping, and structures with <br />contiguous properties; impact of the use on the market value of contiguous properties; <br />impact on the general public health, safety, and welfare; compatibility with the City's <br />Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />5.5 The Community Development Staff has reviewed the accessory building proposal with <br />regard to the criteria stipulated in Section 1004.0lA4 and concludes that the proposal <br />meets these criteria. Mr. Lichtscheidl's lot is three times larger than a normal Roseville <br />residential lot. Specifically, the proposed detached garage will not create additional <br />traffic nor the need for additional public facilities. With proper exterior building <br />treatment, drainage, the building will not have an impact on surrounding property or <br />values. There appears to be no impact on general health, safety, and public welfare. In <br />addition, the project complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation as low density <br />residential use. <br /> <br />5.6 The proposed location of the new accessory building (detached garage), similar to that of <br />the existing building, will not dramatically impact the property to the north (2562 <br />Western Avenue) and with the inclusion of windows to break-up the north facing wall <br />length, should be a more pleasing to view. <br /> <br />6.0 POLICY & FISCAL IMPLICATION <br /> <br />6.1 The Comprehensive Plan and the Roseville Housing Improvement Plan encourage <br />maintaining and improving residential properties and infrastructure, as well as <br />reconstruction and rebuilding of residential structures (and neighborhoods) throughout <br />the community. <br /> <br />6.2 There are no additional fiscal implications and no public infrastructure improvements or <br />extensions necessary. <br /> <br />7.0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION W/CONDITIONS: <br /> <br />7.1 On March 7, 2002, the City Planner discussed the Commission recommended action with <br />Mr. Lichtscheidl. During this conversation Mr. Lichtscheidl offered to place a solid <br />wood fence along a portion of the south property line which would eliminate the need for <br />landscaping as recommended by the Commission. <br /> <br />PF3374 RCA - CUP 032502 Page 3 <br />