pf_03374 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

5.2 Section 1004.0lA5 (Overall Area) restricts the Lichtscheidl accessory building to the maximum size of the principal structure footprint or 1,060 square feet. 5.3 Section 1004.0lA6 (Maximum Total Surface Area) restricts the Lichtscheidl parcel to a maximum impervious area of 30% or 11,290 square feet. The proposal would create a total impervious coverage of 3,412 square feet, well below the parcel allowance. 5.4 Section 1004.0lA4 (Requirements for Increased Size) describes the criteria under which a CUP must be evaluated by the Planning Commission and City Council. The criteria are as follows: impact of parking; impact on parks, streets, and other public facilities; compatibility of site plan, internal traffic circulation, landscaping, and structures with contiguous properties; impact of the use on the market value of contiguous properties; impact on the general public health, safety, and welfare; compatibility with the City's Comprehensive Plan. 5.5 The Community Development Staff has reviewed the accessory building proposal with regard to the criteria stipulated in Section 1004.0lA4 and concludes that the proposal meets these criteria. Mr. Lichtscheidl's lot is three times larger than a normal Roseville residential lot. Specifically, the proposed detached garage will not create additional traffic nor the need for additional public facilities. With proper exterior building treatment, drainage, the building will not have an impact on surrounding property or values. There appears to be no impact on general health, safety, and public welfare. In addition, the project complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation as low density residential use. 5.6 The proposed location of the new accessory building (detached garage), similar to that of the existing building, will not dramatically impact the property to the north (2562 Western Avenue) and with the inclusion of windows to break-up the north facing wall length, should be a more pleasing to view. 6.0 POLICY & FISCAL IMPLICATION 6.1 The Comprehensive Plan and the Roseville Housing Improvement Plan encourage maintaining and improving residential properties and infrastructure, as well as reconstruction and rebuilding of residential structures (and neighborhoods) throughout the community. 6.2 There are no additional fiscal implications and no public infrastructure improvements or extensions necessary. 7.0 STAFF RECOMMENDATION W/CONDITIONS: 7.1 On March 7, 2002, the City Planner discussed the Commission recommended action with Mr. Lichtscheidl. During this conversation Mr. Lichtscheidl offered to place a solid wood fence along a portion of the south property line which would eliminate the need for landscaping as recommended by the Commission. PF3374 RCA - CUP 032502 Page 3