Laserfiche WebLink
Attachment E <br />amount of time to complete given the level of detail required, its potentially large <br />34 <br />scope, and the fact that the amendment is not the Engineering Division’s highest <br />35 <br />priority project; <br />36 <br />b. <br />The proposalis generally consistent with the Comprehensive Planin thatthe <br />37 <br />residential improvements conform tothe size and scale of what is promoted by the <br />38 <br />Comprehensive Plan’s goals and policies for residential areas; <br />39 <br />c. <br />The proposal is consistent with the intent of the zoning ordinances because whilethe <br />40 <br />new improvements will involve more “building footprints and paved surfaces” than <br />41 <br />the code text strictly allows, the zoning ordinance’s intent is to regulate impervious <br />42 <br />coverage and the proposed impervious coverage is within the regulatory limit; <br />43 <br />d. <br />The proposalmakes reasonable use of the subject property because the improvements <br />44 <br />would appear and function like a typical residential property while the proper <br />45 <br />installation and maintenance of a pervious paving system will mitigate excess storm <br />46 <br />water impacts; <br />47 <br />e. <br />The property possesses the kind of unique characteristics that justify approval of the <br />48 <br />requested varianceinthe substandard parcel has area, which has the effect of the <br />49 <br />proposed improvements occupying a larger percentage of the property than if the <br />50 <br />improvements were situated on a parcel of conforming area. Moreover, the proposal <br />51 <br />is consistent with code requirements likely to be adopted in the near future, although <br />52 <br />the exact timing of such azoning amendment is uncertain,and <br />53 <br />f. <br />Although the proposed residenceis larger than thehistorically small homes in the <br />54 <br />area, many of those older homes were originally built as cabins and the scale of the <br />55 <br />proposed development is consistent with that of the newer homes that are being built <br />56 <br />to replace the older structures, so approval of the variancewould not negatively alter <br />57 <br />the character of the surrounding residential neighborhood. <br />58 <br />NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Roseville Variance Board, to approvea <br />59 <br />varianceto §1004.08of the City Code to allow the proposed excess paved surfaces and building <br />60 <br />footprints at 365 S Owasso Boulevard, subject to the following conditions: <br />61 <br />a. <br />The driveway shall utilize materials and installation methods that are determined by <br />62 <br />the City Engineer toachieve at least 50% perviousness as proposed and reviewed with <br />63 <br />the variance application;and <br />64 <br />b. <br />Impervious surface area shall be limited to 25% of the parcel area, and the applicant <br />65 <br />shall continue to work with Engineering Division staff to complete the Residential <br />66 <br />Storm Water Permit process or otherwise comply with comparable City regulations in <br />67 <br />place at the time of construction to install and maintain the pervious pavement. <br />68 <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Variance <br />69 <br />Board Member ____andupon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: ________; <br />70 <br />and____votedagainst; <br />71 <br />WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br />72 <br />Page 2of 3 <br /> <br />