Laserfiche WebLink
<br />5.3 Assuming this amendment is approved by the City Council, it will still require the review <br />and approval of the Metropolitan Council. <br /> <br />6.0 STAFF FINDINGS: <br /> <br />6.1 The County Road C Streetscape Framework Manual is consistent with the development <br />goals in the Transportation portion of Vista 2000 as well as Section 5, Transportation, of <br />the City's Comprehensive Plan. The Manual is compatible with other redevelopment <br />plans adjacent to the County Road C Corridor. <br /> <br />7.0 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: <br /> <br />7.1 On March 6, 2002, the Roseville Planning Commission held the public hearing regarding <br />the Comprehensive Plan amendment. At said hearing a couple of residents and a few <br />Commissioners asked City Staff and Task Force consultant questions pertaining the <br />Streetscape Framework proposal (see attached minutes). <br /> <br />7.2 The Planning Commission recommended (6-0) approval of the request to amend the text <br />of the Comprehensive Plan to include the County Rose C Streetscape Master Plan into <br />Section 5, Transportation. <br /> <br />7.0 SUGGESTED CITY COUNCIL ACTION: <br /> <br />7.1 By motion, approve (modify or deny) the request to amend the text of the Roseville <br />Comprehensive Plan, Section 5, Transportation, to include the County Road C <br />Streetscape Framework Manual. <br /> <br />Prepared by: Debra Bloom, Assistant Public Works Director (490-2221) and Thomas Paschke, <br />City Planner (490-2236). <br /> <br />Attachments: Task Force Roster, Letter from Task Force, County Road C Streetscape Framework Manual. 60-Day <br />Schedule: Not Applicable <br /> <br />PF3382 RCA (03/25/02) -Page 3 <br />