My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03384
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3300
>
pf_03384
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 1:57:30 PM
Creation date
6/3/2005 2:59:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3384
Planning Files - Type
Miscellaneous
Address
North East Diagonal
Project Name
North East Diagonal
Applicant
City of Roseville
Status
Non-Active
Additional Information
Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Roseville Comments on North East Diagonal Land Use Scenarios <br />(1/28/02) <br /> <br />1. Commuter use and/or a trail along rail corridor is consistent with Roseville <br />Compo Plan. <br /> <br />2. Significant new multi-family and employment sites that are within 1f. mile of <br />N.E.D. have been reviewed - many do not reflect current project planning or the <br />City's Comprehensive Plan. HGA should clarify the plan from which these land <br />use configurations was obtained. (Many of these would be major land use <br />designation changes from the current vision of the community.) <br /> <br />a. City Hall Site and Central Park (not mentioned) <br />b. Mobile Home Park (not mentioned) <br />C. Reiling Senior Housing site (5 acres) at Woodhill and Lex. (not <br />mentioned) <br />d. Reiling Housing Site (10 acres) at "C" and Dale. (not mentioned) <br />e. Arona-Hamline Housing. The City Plan is closest to intensive/smart <br />growth, but city's total dwelling units are higher; HGA needs to clarify <br />with city community development staff. <br />f. Twin Lakes Housing - boundaries entirely different than AUAR and <br />Master Plan, HGA should clarify with city community development staff <br />g. Twin Lakes Business Park Jobs - boundaries entirely different than <br />AUAR and Master Plan, HGA should clarify with city community <br />development staff; Parkway is not shown as transit connection, nor is <br />impact on transportation known. <br />h. Centre Pointe Business Park Jobs (not shown) <br />I. West 35W at Long Lake (not shown) <br />J. Amoco Business Park Site - shows all housing (400 units), Hazardous <br />industries to west; surrounded by industrial, not consistent with Compo <br />Plan, which projects a Business Park. City staff estimated over 750,000 <br />s.f. of business park. HGA should clarify. <br />k. Paper Calmenson Business/Office Park - assumes internal drive patterns; <br />connecting roads to 280; changes density of uses; no projections for <br />business parks jobs; includes portions of Minneapolis. 1.4 million s.f. <br />estimated includes 50% in Mpls. Shows small buildings; industrial uses <br />adjacent to north south rail line, not the office uses. <br />l. Walnut Street at "C" - new development (not shown) <br />m. Patton Road Business Park (not shown) <br /> <br />3. Assumptions for housing and jobs per s.f. are reasonable, although higher than <br />the city's numbers used in comprehensive plan. <br />4. Reverse commute does not seem to be accounted for in layouts. <br /> <br />Notes from: Dean Maschka, Dennis Welsch, Cathy Bennett, Duane Schwartz, Deb <br />Bloom (01128/02) Q:Comdev\Special projects\NE Diagonal\Concepts for North East Diagonal <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.