pf_03299 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

requested that the next Council meeting on this matter be set so we could be present to state our concerns. We were assured that the meeting would be scheduled so that we would have that opportunity. The Council meeting date of June 11 makes us wonder about the conduct of Council affairs. The letter over your signature that we received refers to a 4-ft set back. Cheney's petition did not request a 4-ft set back; neither did Cheney request it at the meeting where he had the opportunity to do so. It was done unilaterally by the presiding officer. We find this preferential action strange. At the May 4 meeting, we provided a written statement to the presiding officer and we had time for just a brief statement of our concerns. The presiding officer did not read out our letter for the benefit of those who were to vote at the conclusion of that meeting. In effect those voting did so without any knowledge of the specific details. For example, no one acknowledged having personally examined the site of the hazardous driveway resulting from the petitioner's design. No one of those voting seemed to know that all the drainage will have to be on Acorn Road with nothing at all draining through County B. We maintain that our concerns regarding safety, drainage and the size of the structure in relation to the size of the site were ignored. We further maintain that more than one of the six criteria on which favorable Council action depends continue to be in violation. Please acknowledge your receipt of this e-mail with an e-mail reply, as we are traveling and can not receive postal mail. We can be reached for e-mail reply at <ram@me.umn.edu> Sincerely yours, Subbiah and Vivian S. Ramalingam, May 25, 2001 2182 Acorn Road, Roseville, MN 55113 Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices http://auctions.yahoo.com/ 2