My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03405
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3400
>
pf_03405
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 2:00:26 PM
Creation date
6/15/2005 9:05:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3405
Planning Files - Type
Miscellaneous
Project Name
HOUSING and REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Applicant
City of Roseville
Status
Approved
Date Final City Council Action
9/23/2002
Additional Information
Establishment of an HRA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
170
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />arrangements. Most TIF costs are incurred at the beginning of a project, typically to acquire <br />land, demolish buildings, decontaminate brownfields, and/or install public improvements. <br />When a city issues a bond, funds are provided to the project, and tax increments <br />generated by the property each year are available to pay the principal and interest on the <br />bonds. When a city issues general obligation tax increment bonds, they are secured by the full <br />faith and credit of the community. This means that if the property owner defaults on the <br />property taxes as they become due, the city must then levy taxes against all property owners <br />within the community to meet the payment of the bonds. <br />Many cities have used pay-as-you-go financing, in which the developer pays for the <br />public costs of site acquisition and site preparation in advance of any subsidy. The developer is <br />then reimbursed for TIF-eligible expenses when tax increment revenue is generated by the <br />project. In pay-as-you-go situations, taxpayers are not at risk if the property taxes generated by <br />the new development are not sufficient to repay the debt obligation. The developer assumes <br />the risk, because the city's only obligation is to provide the developer with a percentage of the <br />tax increment revenue, usually 90%; if tax increment revenues are not as high as anticipated, <br />the city is not obligated to fully reimburse the developer. <br />Cities may also use their own funds to support the preliminary costs of development. <br />The mechanics of this type of internal financing can work in a number of ways. Cities may <br />internally borrow money from their general funds, economic development funds, municipal utility <br />funds, or federal grant funds (Legislative Auditor, 1996). Cities then use tax increments <br />generated from development projects to repay the internal loans from these funds. Cities may <br />also use pooled tax increments from an existing (and successful) TIF district to support the <br />start-up costs in a new TIF district in the same project area, or to create a development fund, or <br />to transfer money to various city improvement projects related to tax increment districts. <br />Planning, Disclosure, and Reporting Requirements. By state law in Minnesota, prior to <br />establishing a tax increment district, the city or development authority must prepare and <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.