My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03405
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3400
>
pf_03405
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 2:00:26 PM
Creation date
6/15/2005 9:05:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3405
Planning Files - Type
Miscellaneous
Project Name
HOUSING and REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Applicant
City of Roseville
Status
Approved
Date Final City Council Action
9/23/2002
Additional Information
Establishment of an HRA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
170
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />1960s. The federal government paid two-thirds of the costs of these projects. Minneapolis was <br /> <br /> <br />required to contribute one-third in cash or in non-cash contributions, such as land, roads, and <br /> <br />sewers. <br /> <br /> <br />In the late 1960s, the federal government decided it would no longer continue this form <br /> <br />of basic project financing. It moved to establish Neighborhood Development Project financing <br /> <br />and then, in the mid-1970s, Community Development Block Grants (CDBG). This was a <br /> <br />dramatic change in the federal government's role in local efforts, since its participation now <br /> <br />came in annual increments rather than as one-time funding at the beginning of a project, and <br /> <br />the permitted uses of funds were limited. This approach was designed to ease budgetary <br /> <br />problems at the federal level and to generally reduce federal funding for housing. <br /> <br />While the federal government continues to provide CDBG financing, the bulk of these <br /> <br />monies are used for neighborhood revitalization and improved community faGilities and services. <br /> <br />Only a small percentage of these funds are available for economic development activities. Tax <br /> <br />increment financing has thus become the main tool cities use for redevelopment. <br /> <br />In the Twin Cities metropolitan area, tax increment financing is also a tool for reducing <br /> <br />urban sprawl by containing development within existing urban areas, as specified in the <br /> <br />Metropolitan Land Use Bill and the Metropolitan Council Development Framework. <br /> <br />The tools that are used for economic development have thus evolved as a response to a <br /> <br />broad national policy that encourages local initiatives and local control of urban development <br /> <br />and redevelopment. The most useful of these tools include industrial revenu,e bonds, tax <br /> <br />increment financing, and CDBG funding. A combination of these tools has been used to combat <br /> <br />a set of factors that would otherwise discourage development: multiple ownelrship patterns, <br /> <br />incompatible land uses, underutilized land, contaminated land, unwilling sellers (slumlords), title <br /> <br />problems, and suburban competition. In order to maintain vital urban centers, cities thus <br /> <br />provide the vital public assistance to stimulate private development that othelwise would not <br /> <br />occur. <br /> <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.