My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03405
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3400
>
pf_03405
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 2:00:26 PM
Creation date
6/15/2005 9:05:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3405
Planning Files - Type
Miscellaneous
Project Name
HOUSING and REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Applicant
City of Roseville
Status
Approved
Date Final City Council Action
9/23/2002
Additional Information
Establishment of an HRA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
170
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Counties. When tax increment districts are decertified, counties also share in the <br /> <br /> <br />increased tax base. Counties thus experience an increase in property tax revenues without <br /> <br /> <br />investing dollars to finance the redevelopment that creates this increase. <br /> <br /> <br />Counties also benefit if TIF is used to concentrate development in the central cities and <br /> <br /> <br />inner-ring suburbs. As development moves further out to the fringes of metro areas, county <br /> <br /> <br />roads experience heavier use, which translates into higher costs to maintain and service these <br /> <br /> <br />roads. In contrast, county roads within central cities and inner-ring suburbs are generally co- <br /> <br /> <br />maintained by the county and the city and have been designed to withstand heavy traffic. <br /> <br />School Districts. Under pre-1979 TIF districts, cities were able to help finance <br /> <br /> <br />construction of schools. This allowed school districts to build new schools in newly-developed <br /> <br /> <br />or redeveloped areas. This is no longer an option for the use of tax increment financing. <br /> <br /> <br />School districts, like cities and counties, have received increased tax revenues as a <br /> <br /> <br />result of tax increment financed development. Once tax increment districts are decertified, the <br /> <br /> <br />total assessed property value is available for school district levies. <br /> <br /> <br />An argument frequently made is that the creation of a tax increment district reduces the <br /> <br /> <br />amount of tax revenue available to school districts. This argument was never valid, however, <br /> <br /> <br />since school district funding has always been a combination of a property tax levy and a state <br /> <br /> <br />aid payment, which resulted in schools always receiving the full revenue to which they were <br /> <br />entitled. <br /> <br /> <br />In 2001, the state legislature took over the financing of public schools; since then, school <br /> <br /> <br />districts have no longer been funded through the property tax system. <br /> <br /> <br />The State. The state gives aid to local governments under three major <br /> <br /> <br />intergovernmental aid programs: education aid for local school districts; local government aid for <br /> <br /> <br />cities, counties, and towns; and property tax credit reimbursements for all local taxing districts. <br /> <br /> <br />The calculation of aid under each of these programs is affected directly or indirectly by the <br /> <br /> <br />amount of assessed property value in the local taxing district. As assessed property values <br /> <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.