My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03502
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3500
>
pf_03502
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 2:00:42 PM
Creation date
6/28/2005 10:22:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3502
Planning Files - Type
Variance
Address
2555 SNELLING AVE N
Project Name
THE PRESS GYM
Applicant
THE PRESS GYM
Status
Approved
PIN
092923110074
Date Final City Council Action
8/18/2003
Date Final Planning Commission Action
8/6/2003
Planning Files - Resolution #
10132
Additional Information
GROUND SIGN (RESOLUTION #2 10133
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />5.3 In May/June of 2003, the City Planner requested the City Attorney review the sign code <br />to determine whether off site signage would be permissible and if so, would it be <br />permissible on the Sunrise parcel. The Attorney concluded through a review of the Code <br />and the Sunrise PUD Agreement that a variance was necessary to support a second sign <br />on the Sunrise parcel. <br /> <br />5.4 Mr. Stock has indicated in his narrative that the Press Gym is highly reliant on drive-by <br />visibility for survival and that the Sunrise facility and a privacy fence along the north <br />property line adjacent the west parking lot obstructs visibility completely from Snelling <br />A venue and limits visibility from Oakcrest Avenue. <br /> <br />5.5 After exhausting a number of options, Mr. Stock sought the support of Sunrise Assisted <br />Living to allow the installation of a sign in the front yard adjacent to Snelling A venue, for <br />which they have provided a letter of support. <br /> <br />5.6 Section 1013.02 states: Where there are practical difficulties or unusual hardships <br />in the way of carrying out the strict letter of the provisions of this code, the city <br />council shall have the power, in a specific case and after notice and public hearings, <br />to vary any such provision in harmony with the general purpose and intent thereof <br />and may impose such additional conditions as it considers necessary so that the <br />public health, safety, and general welfare may be secured and substantial justice <br />done. <br /> <br />5.7 State Statute 462.357, subd. 6 (2) provides authority for the city to "hear requests <br />for variances from the literal provisions of the ordinance in instances where their <br />strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to <br />the individual property under consideration, and to grant such variances only when <br />it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of <br />the ordinance. "Undue hardship" as used in connection with the granting of a <br />variance means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used <br />under conditions allowed by the official controls, the plight of the landowner is due <br />to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner, and the <br />variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic <br />considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the <br />property exists under the terms of the ordinance.... The board or governing body as <br />the case may be may impose conditions in the granting of variances to insure <br />compliance and to protect" <br /> <br />5.8 The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions <br />allowed by the official controls: The Press Gym site could place signage on the facility <br />and install a sign in the front, side or rear yard. However, these signs would not be <br />visible from Snelling A venue and have limited visibility from Oakcrest Avenue and <br />County Road C. The allowance of a sign at or near the front property line of the Sunrise <br />parcel is a reasonable and practical solution to a unique situation. Community <br />Development Staff has determined that the property can be made more usable and <br /> <br />PF3502 - ReA 081803 - Page 3 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.