pf_03502 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

7.2 The City Planner stated that a lit sign is permissible under the City Code, but that the applicant would need approval by Sunrise Assisted Living for such a sign and the necessary electrical line. 7.3 The Commission asked for the details of the sign, asking if the sign would be 4'x 6' and/or would the sign maintain the bright orange coloring. The applicant stated the sign would be 4'x 6', maintaining the coloring to support full viewing from drivers. The Commission asked if covering would be provided to cover the back/open side of the sign. The applicant stated coverage of back side of sign could be an option. 7.4 The Commission Chairman asked that the sign be setback 5 feet from the walking path due to buildup of snow during winter months and lessen the effect on pedestrians walking by sign. The Chairman made a motion allowing the sign to be no closer than 5 feet to the walking path, however, the motion died. 7.5 The Planning Commission voted (4-1) to recommend approval of a variance to Section 1009.03M and voted (5-0) recommending approval of a variance to SectionlO09.04A2 (Multiple Family Units) of the Roseville City Code, to allow a second monument sign based on the findings of Section 5 and conditions of Section 6 8.0 SUGGESTED CITY COUNCIL ACTION: 8.1 Adopt a resolution approving a 14 foot front setback VARIANCE to Section 1009.03M (Ground Signs) of the Roseville City Code, based on the findings of Section 5 and conditions of Section 6 of the project report dated August 18, 2003. 8.2 Adopt a resolution approving a VARIANCE to 1009.04A2 (Multiple Family Units) of the Roseville City Code, to allow a second monument sign, based on the findings of Section 5 and conditions of Section 6 of the project report dated August 18, 2003. Prepared by: Thomas Paschke (651-490-2236) Attachments: Location map, narrative, site plan, and aerial photo. \\Victoria\CommDev\Planning Files\3500-3549\3502_Press Gym\PF3502 RCA 081803.doc PF3502 - RCA 081803 - Page 5 of 5