Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br /> <br />Based on the information provided and the findings in Section 5 of this project report, the <br />Community Development Staff recommended approval of a 14 foot front yard variance <br />to Section 1009.03M and Section 1009.04A2 of the Roseville City Code for Sunrise <br />Assisted Living and Dan Stock (Press Gym) to allow the installation of a second <br />monument sign at 2555 Snelling Avenue, subject to the following conditions: <br /> <br />a. The sign must no larger than 48 square feet in size and of a V-shaped design with <br />2 - 4 foot by 6 foot sign panels. <br />b. The sign must be installed a minimum of 1 foot from the property line adjacent to <br />Snelling Avenue in the northeast portion of the parcel. <br />c. The review and approval of a sign permit must be consistent with the approved <br />plans and variances. <br /> <br />There was no public comment offered. Chairman Mulder closed the hearing. <br /> <br />Motion: Member Peper moved, seconded by Member Bakeman, to recommend approval <br />of a 14 foot front setback variance to Section 1009 .03M of the Roseville City Code, <br />based on the findings of Section 5 and conditions of Section 6 of the project report dated <br />August 6, 2003. <br /> <br />Chair Mulder preferred the sign setback be five feet from the sidewalk or some <br />distance because of snow storage and visual impact from pedestrians. <br /> <br />Motion: Member Mulder amended the motion to set the sign five feet from the <br />trail and one foot from any property line. <br /> <br />Motion failed for lack of second. <br /> <br />Ayes: 4, Stone, Peper, Bakeman, Ipsen <br />Nays: 1, Mulder <br />Motion carried 4-1. <br /> <br />Motion: Member Peper moved, seconded by Member Bakeman, to recommend approval <br />ofa variance to 1009.04A2 (Multiple Family Units) of the Roseville City Code, to allow <br />a second monument sign, based on the findings of Section 5 and conditions of Section 6 <br />of the project report dated August 6, 2003. <br /> <br />Member Bakeman stated that Sunrise permission has been obtained by Mr. Stock. <br /> <br />Ayes: 5 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br />