My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03512
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3500
>
pf_03512
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/20/2007 3:27:22 PM
Creation date
6/28/2005 1:28:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3512
Planning Files - Type
Variance
Address
303 SOUTH OWASSO BLVD
Project Name
CHARLES E ANDERSON
Applicant
CHARLES E ANDERSON
Status
Approved
PIN
012923120026
Date Final City Council Action
9/22/2003
Date Final Planning Commission Action
9/3/2003
Planning Files - Resolution #
10145
Additional Information
FENCE
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />1 <br />2 a. Planninl?: File 3512: Request by Scott Santanni, 1019 Sherren Street, for <br />3 a Conditional Use Permit in accordance with Section 1004.01A4 and a <br />4 Variance to Section 1004.01A5 (Overall Area) and Section 1004.01A6 <br />5 (Maximum Total Surface Area) of the Roseville City Code to allow the <br />6 construction of a 1,007 sq. ft. detached accessory building. <br />7 <br />8 Chairman Duncan opened the hearing and requested City Planning Thomas Paschke to present <br />9 verbal summary of the staff report dated September 3, 2003. <br />10 <br />11 Scott Santanni, 1019 Sherren Street, has submitted a proposal to construct a detached accessory <br />12 building on his lot. The proposed structure, a 30 foot 6 inch by 33 foot (1,007 sq. ft) storage <br />13 building would be located just north of the existing attached two-stall garage. The sum of the area <br />14 of an attached garage and detached accessory building cannot exceed the size of the house. In this <br />15 case, the proposed 1,007 sq. ft. detached accessory building when combined with the existing 440 <br />16 sq. ft. attached garage, creates 1,447 sq. ft. of combined accessory building square size, which <br />17 size is 458 sq. ft greater than the 898 sq. ft. home. <br />18 The Santanni home was constructed in 1951 and lies on a 28,072 square foot (87 feet by 323 feet) <br />19 parcel. The home has a foundation size of 989 sq. ft.; a rear yard allowance of 1,053 sq. ft.; and <br />20 an impervious coverage allowance of 8,422 sq. ft. <br />21 <br />22 The existing conditions and the proposed accessory building fall well below the maximum <br />23 impervious surface area afforded the parcel. Like wise, the proposed detached accessory building <br />24 is below the size afforded by the Code. However, when combined, the attached garage (440 sq. <br />25 ft.) and proposed detached accessory building (1,007 sq. ft.) exceed the footprint size of the home <br />26 (989 sq. ft) by 458 sq. ft. <br />27 <br />28 Section 1004.0 1A5 reads: "Overall Area: The overall area of attached garage and <br />29 detached accessory building(s) shall not exceed the exterior dimensional footprint of the <br />30 principal structure, excluding any attached garage footprint. <br />31 <br />32 Section 1004.01A4 requires a conditional use permit for an accessory structure exceeding 864 <br />33 square feet in size, up to a maximum of 1,008 square feet, subject to meeting criteria. <br />34 <br />35 City Planner Thomas Paschke reviewed the proposal and explained that it is difficult to justify a <br />36 departure from the strict application of the City Code allowing the applicant to construct the <br />37 proposed detached 1,007 sq. ft detached accessory building. However, there is justification for <br />38 reduced sized detached accessory structure, one that is more in keeping with a double stall <br />39 structure than the triple stall size proposed. Specifically, a detached accessory building 24 feet <br />40 wide by 26 feet deep or 624 sq. ft in size would reduce the variance by 379 sq. ft, but more <br />41 importantly, would afford Mr. Santanni ample storage space for the items stated, and would be in <br />42 keeping with the structures in the neighborhood and no Conditional Use Permit would be required <br />43 for a 624 square foot building. <br />44 <br />45 City Planner Thomas Paschke reviewed the development proposal with regard to the criteria in <br />46 Section 10l3.0l.D (Conditional Use Permit) of the Roseville Zoning Ordinance and concluded <br />47 the proposal meets these criteria. Specifically, a detached accessory building is a permitted use in <br />48 an R-l District. The proposed detached garage will not create additional traffic or the need for <br />49 additional public facilities. With proper exterior building treatment, drainage, and landscaping, <br />50 the building will not have an impact on surrounding property or values. There appears to be no <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.