pf_03512 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

1 impact on general health, safety, and public welfare. In addition, the project complies with the 2 Comprehensive Plan designation as low-density residential uses. 3 4 Mr. Paschke stated that the Community Development Staff recommends approval of a 75 square 5 foot variance to Section 1004.01A5 of the Roseville City Code for Scott Santanni to allow the 6 construction of a detached accessory building in the rear yard at 1019 Sherren Street, subject to 7 the following conditions: 8 9 a. The detached accessory building being limited to a size of 24 feet by 26 feet or 624 10 square feet. 11 b. The parcel being limited to a maximum impervious coverage of 8,422 square feet or 12 30%. 13 c. The detached accessory building being limited to the storage of residential (not 14 commercial) equipment, material, seasonally used recreational vehicle or a seasonally 15 driven vehicle or collectable. 16 d. Submittal of a scaled site plan indicating existing and proposed conditions consistent 17 with the above variance conditions. 18 e. Windows being placed on the east and west building wall to break-up the building 19 wall. 20 f. Gutters installed along the eves of the detached accessory building and directed to the 21 parcel's interior yard to reduce impacts to the adjacent residential properties. 22 g. The review and approval of a building permit must be consistent with the approved 23 plans and variance. 24 25 Chair Duncan asked what the 1 Y2 story house upstairs square foot area of the house was (700 26 square feet for a total of 1600 - 1700 square feet). 27 28 Member Mulder asked what happens if the building (home) changes size? (More accessory 29 structure could be added). 30 31 Chair Duncan asked for a definition of a standard garage. City Planner indicated that no true 32 standard exists; however general rule 24 feet by 26 feet is a good sized two stall garage. 33 34 Scott Santanni explained that his house has a footprint of 1,030 sq. ft., a breezeway of 108 sq. ft., 35 for an overall size of 1,138 sq. ft. He explained that a 700+ sq. ft. garage should be allowed 36 based on the size of the house. There is no visual impact to the neighbors and not visible from 37 the sides or street and that the building will be the same height as the existing garage. The main 38 reason for this garage is storage and for a boat, trailer, snowmobile, tractor. Mr. Santanni added 39 that his proposal is well below the 30% coverage (7%) and less than the 40% rear yard building 40 (1,053 sq. ft.), but the homes footprint is too small at this time. 41 42 Chair Duncan asked if 1,138 sq. ft. was accurate. The City Planner indicated that the numbers 43 appeared to be accurate, adding that the information he used in the report was based on Mr. 44 Santanni's submittal. The City Planner also indicated that Mr. Santanni could construct an 45 accessory building that was up to the maximum 690 sq. ft. or in light of the desires of the 46 applicant, the Planning Commission could support a 728 sq. ft detached accessory building with a 47 30 sq. ft variance. 48 49 Member Stone asked for details of the survey calculations. 50