Laserfiche WebLink
<br />5.3 Built before the 30% surface coverage requirement, the existing improvements (principal <br />structure - 1,091 sq ft., driveway - 1,423 sq. ft., detached garage 572 sq. ft.) exceed the <br />requirement of the Code by 82 square feet. <br /> <br />5.4 Section 1004.01A4 established the criteria for reviewing conditional use permits. In the <br />case of the subject request, the review considers specific impacts the proposed 1,020 sq. <br />ft accessory building creates. Said criteria are listed below: <br /> <br />a. Impactontra1fzc <br />b. Impacts on parks, streets and other public facilities <br />c. Compatibility of the site plan, internal circulation, landscaping and structure <br />with contiguous properties <br />d. Impact of the use on market value of contiguous properties <br />e. Impact on the general public health, safety and welfare <br />f. Compatibility with the City's Comprehensive Plan <br /> <br />5.5 The City Planner has reviewed the development proposal with regard to the criteria in <br />Section 1013.01.D (Conditional Use Permit) of the Roseville Zoning Ordinance and has <br />concluded the proposal meets these criteria. Specifically, a detached accessory building is <br />a permitted use in an R-1 District. The proposed detached garage will not create <br />additional traffic or the need for additional public facilities. With proper exterior building <br />treatment, drainage, and landscaping, the building will not have an impact on <br />surrounding property or values. There appears to be no impact on general health, safety, <br />and public welfare. In addition, the project complies with the Comprehensive Plan <br />designation as low-density residential uses. <br /> <br />5.6 The City Planner has reviewed the development proposal with regard to variance <br />standards and determined that it is difficult to justify a departure from the strict <br />application of the City Code allowing the applicant to construct the proposed detached <br />1,020 sq. ft detached accessory building. However, there is justification for reducing the <br />size of the replacement garage to a size closer to the 900 sq. ft rear yard maximum <br />afforded the parcel. <br /> <br />5.7 Specifically, a 32 foot by 30 foot (960 sq. ft.) detached accessory building designed with <br />attic trusses would reduce overall impervious coverage by 60 sq. ft. and be nearer to the <br />rear yard allowance, but more importantly, the design would still afford Mr. Davis a three <br />car garage with ample interior storage area for the items indicated. <br /> <br />5.8 Section 1013.02 states: Where there are practical difficulties or unusual hardships <br />in the way of carrying out the strict letter of the provisions of this code, the city <br />council shall have the power, in a specific case and after notice and public hearings, <br />to vary any such provision in harmony with the general purpose and intent thereof <br />and may impose such additional conditions as it considers necessary so that the <br />public health, safety, and general welfare may be secured and substantial justice <br />done. <br /> <br />PF3518 - ReA 092203 - Page 3 of 6 <br />