pf_03518 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

WHEREAS; it has been determined that the proposed request by Michael Davis meets the criteria stipulated in Section 1004.0lA4 of the Roseville City Code. Specifically, a detached accessory building is a permitted use in an R-l District. The proposed detached garage will not create additional traffic or the need for additional public facilities. With proper exterior building treatment, drainage, and landscaping, the building will not have an impact on surrounding property or values. There appears to be no impact on general health, safety, and public welfare. In addition, the project complies with the Comprehensive Plan designation as low-density residential uses; and WHEREAS, The Roseville Planning Commission held the public hearing regarding the Davis request on September 3, 2003, recommending (7-0) approval of the Conditional Use Permit to allow construction of a 960 square foot detached accessory building in the rear yard of property located at 2730 Griggs Street, based on the findings of Section 5 and conditions of Section 6 of the project report dated September 3,2003; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Roseville City Council, to APPROVE the request by Michael Davis for a CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT in accordance with Section 1004.0lA4 of the Roseville City Code, subject to the following conditions; 1. A maximum detached accessory building size of 30 feet by 32 feet or 960 sq. ft. 2. A maximum impervious coverage of 3,564 sq. ft. or 35.6%. 3. A maximum accessory building height of 15 feet to the mid-point of the roof truss. 4. The detached accessory building being limited to the storage of residential vehicles, lawn and garden items, seasonally used recreational vehicles or items (snowmobiles), household items, and a dog kennel. 5. Submittal of a scaled site plan indicating existing and proposed conditions consistent with the above variance conditions. 6. Windows being placed on the north and south building wall to break-up the building wall. 7. Gutters installed along the eves of the detached accessory building and directed to the parcel's interior yard (northeast) to reduce impacts to the adjacent residential properties. 8. The review and approval of a building permit must be consistent with the approved plans and variance. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council 2