My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03524
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3500
>
pf_03524
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 2:03:27 PM
Creation date
6/29/2005 8:56:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3524
Planning Files - Type
Conditional Use Permit
Address
2172 LEXINGTON AVE N
Project Name
SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC
Applicant
SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC
Status
Approved
PIN
112923330065
Date Final City Council Action
10/13/2003
Date Final Planning Commission Action
10/1/2003
Planning Files - Resolution #
10154
Additional Information
RESOLUTIONS 10154 & 10156
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
262
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />conditions are not improved, but increased; therefore the use requested is not compatible with the <br />existing site. <br /> <br />d) that the proposed request/project will impact the market value of contiguous properties for the <br />following reasons: Reduced market values are not a criteria that appears to be impacted by the <br />proposal. However, marginalized property value increases in comparison to other properties <br />adjacent to a liquor store, may exist. Additionally, insufficient data is available to show that <br />market value of other similar uses in the "buyers shed" will not be harmed. <br /> <br />e) that the proposed request/project will impact the general public health, safety and welfare for the <br />following reasons: Public health, safety, and welfare concerns have been expressed, yet the data <br />IS lacking to establish precise conflicts with the proposed use. More data may be appropriate, <br />although, there do exist public policy concerns relating the separation of liquor sales from other <br />products. <br /> <br />t) that the proposed project is not compatible with the City's Comprehensive Plan for the following <br />reasons: The data, relating to use and traffic counts, is inconsistent between experts. <br />Accordingly, the proposed use and impacts are inconsistent with the comprehensive plan. <br />Specifically, the comprehensive plan estimates and data regarding capacity and acceptable or <br />unacceptable traffic level of service (grade "D") is inconsistent with the data and assumptions <br />contained in the report prepared on behalf of the applicant. <br /> <br />Member Stone said there is a public policy debate in the legislature regarding liquor in grocery stores - is this <br />a circumvention of the law? <br /> <br />Member Ipsen asked the Commission to evaluate "a-f'. <br /> <br />Chair Traynor noted that if any of these findings are met, it is appropriate to deny based on health, safety, <br />welfare, traffic and congestion. <br /> <br />Member Blank supported the Stone motion. Member Peper supported the Stone motion, preferring to have <br />other SuperAmerica information to evaluate. <br /> <br />Roll call: <br />Ayes: Blank, Peper, Bakeman, Stone, Ipsen, Traynor. <br />Nays: None <br /> <br />Motion to recommend denial is approved 6-0. <br /> <br />PF3524 - ReA 012604 - Page 14 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.