pf_03524 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

b. that the proposed request/project will impact parks, streets and other public facilities for the following reasons: insufficient data regarding public safety concerns due to the increase (3.5%) in traffic entering and exiting the site at the four access/conflict points in an area (historically) known to have a need for accident reduction. There will be an impact on the streets and other public facilities and services. c. that the proposed request/project does not have a compatible site plan, internal circulation, landscape and structure, with contiguous properties for the following reasons: The increased traffic and more intense use of the site will increase internal circulation conflicts. Such internal circulation concerns related to the site plan will impact both traffic and pedestrian motion. Information related to deliveries, optimum site design if fully redeveloped, and entry/exit points do not support the argument that there will not be additional internal circulation problems. Rather, the site plan before us is not significantly changed from the existing site plan, circulation conditions are not improved, but increased; therefore the use requested is not compatible with the existing site. d. that the proposed request/project will impact the market value of contiguous properties for the following reasons: Reduced market values are not a criteria that appears to be impacted by the proposal. However, marginalized property value increases in comparison to other properties adjacent to a liquor store, may exist. Additionally, insufficient data is available to show that market value of other similar uses in the "buyers shed" will not be harmed. e. that the proposed request/project will impact the general public health, safety and welfare for the following reasons: Public health, safety, and welfare concerns have been expressed, yet the data is lacking to establish precise conflicts with the proposed use. More data may be appropriate, although, there do exist public policy concerns relating the separation of liquor sales from other products. f. that the proposed project is not compatible with the City's Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons: The data, relating to use and traffic counts, is inconsistent between experts. Accordingly, the proposed use and impacts are inconsistent with the comprehensive plan. Specifically, the comprehensive plan estimates and data regarding capacity and acceptable or unacceptable traffic level of service (grade "D") is inconsistent with the data and assumptions contained in the report prepared on behalf of the applicant. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Roseville City Council, to DENY a CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT in accordance with Section 1005.04C17 and 1013.01D of the Roseville City Code for Speedway SuperAmerica, 2172 Lexington Avenue, based on the above findings. 2