My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03524
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3500
>
pf_03524
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 2:03:27 PM
Creation date
6/29/2005 8:56:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3524
Planning Files - Type
Conditional Use Permit
Address
2172 LEXINGTON AVE N
Project Name
SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC
Applicant
SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC
Status
Approved
PIN
112923330065
Date Final City Council Action
10/13/2003
Date Final Planning Commission Action
10/1/2003
Planning Files - Resolution #
10154
Additional Information
RESOLUTIONS 10154 & 10156
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
262
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Use of the SuperAmerica site as an off-sale liquor store is compatible with the <br />existing site plan, has a minimal impact on internal circulation, requires no <br />additional landscaping, and the structure and use have previously been <br />determined to be compatible with contiguous properties. <br /> <br />First, the liquor store component only requires remodeling of the interior of the <br />current structure and the change in use does not require additional on-site parking <br />spaces (both uses require 5/1 ,000 sq. ft. of floor area or 30 on-site spaces for the <br />6,000 sq. ft. structure). The site has an existing 37 parking spaces, not counting <br />the 21 at the pump islands. <br /> <br />Second, the Consultant has reviewed the site's intemal circulation and concluded <br />that there are slight conflicts with delivery vehicles, but not with customer traffic. <br />Patrons typically use the west parking lot, while the east parking lot has limited <br />use. Having the liquor store entrance on the east side will minimize traffic and <br />parking congestion during peak use. The Consultant further concludes that it is <br />not necessary to seek a removal of the two access points nearest the County Road <br />B and Lexington Avenue intersection. These accesses actually assist in properly <br />relieving the site of vehicles during peak use. <br /> <br />Third, the off-sale liquor component does not trigger the need for updating or <br />adding landscaping to the site. Currently a solid wood fence buffers and screens <br />the building and more importantly the parking lot from the apartments to the north <br />and single family residential on the east. <br /> <br />Fourth, most Roseville commercial uses, including liquor stores, are located on <br />high traffic volume streets or intersections, and are usually adjacent residential <br />uses. The SuperAmerica parcel qualifies as such a site, and given the limited <br />increase in traffic/patrons that would use the off-sale liquor store, the Community <br />Development Department concludes the use (2,200 sq. ft. liquor store) to be a <br />compatible use with contiguous properties, similar to Roseville Liquor at 700 <br />County Road B (B-Dale Center) across for Parkview School; Network Liquor at <br />Lexington Shoppes, adjacent to Veterans Park; Hamline Liquor at Hamline <br />Shopping Center adjacent a former park site and Roseville Covenant Church; <br />MGM Liquor at Lexington Plaza (recently approved); and MGM Liquor in Saint <br />Paul at Larpenteur and Lexington. <br /> <br />d. Impact of the use on market value of contiguous properties: <br /> <br />Use of the SuperAmerica site as an off-sale liquor store will not have a <br />detrimental impact on the market value of contiguous properties. Specifically, in <br />November 2003, the Community Development Department completed a <br />residential market value study utilizing Ramsey County date from 1998 to 2002 <br />concluding there is no negative impact on surrounding property value. No <br />property lost value and all were growing at the same rate (see attachment). <br />However it is true (as pointed out at the Planning Commission hearing) that <br /> <br />PF3524 - ReA 012604 - Page 4 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.