pf_03537 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Planning Commission's recommended ordinance to the City Council, showing changes they made to Staff's original ordinance. 1 Last Revised: December 3, 2003 (Planning Commission) 2 Attorney Istaff review after first reading: , 2004 (Dennis Welsch) 3 4 PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 5 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10, SECTION 1011, Subsection 1011.01 through 6 1011.05 PERTAINING TO NONCONFORMING USES AND STRUCTURES AND 7 DEFINTIONS (SECTION 1002.02) 8 9 THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS: 10 SECTION 1. Purpose. The Roseville City Code, Title 10, Sections 1011.01 through 11 1011.05 and Section 1002.02 are hereby amended by revising language regarding 12 nonconforming uses and structures to provide more clarity and ease of use of this section. 13 SECTION 2. Section 1002.02 (Definition of "Nonconforming Structure") is hereby 14 amended as follows: 15 NONCONFORMING USE OR STRUCTURE: A nonconforming use or stmcture is 16 any use, placement, or arrangement of land and/or stmctures legally existing prior to the 17 enactment of a Code provision prohibiting such use or stmcture. 18 19 SECTION 3. CHAPTER 1011 and Section 1011 (Title) is hereby amended to read as 20 follows: 21 CHAPTER 1011 22 NONFORMING USES AND STRUCTURES 23 24 SECTION 4. Section 1011, subsections 1011.01 through 1011.05 are hereby 25 amended as follows: 26 27 1011.01: DEFINITION: 28 A nonconforming use or stmcture . See definition in Section 1002.02. 29 1011.02: EXISTING STRUCTURES OR USES: 30 A. A pre-existing nonconforming use or stmcture may be continued but may not be extended, 31 expanded, intensified or changed, unless to a conforming use. Exceptions include: 32 33 1. An expansion of a pre-existing residential principal or accessory stmcture in an R-l or 34 R-2 zoning district which maintains the same property line setbacks and stmcture 35 separations provided there is no further encroachment of any non-conforming stmctural 1