Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1 Member Bakeman state she will not support the motion because of the encroachment to the bluff. <br />2 This home is much closer to the lake than homes surrounding it. With no other improvements to <br />3 the 60+ year old home, at a future date it could be rebuilt at a separate setback. <br />4 <br />5 Mr. Badzinski advised he bought the house to protect the view and protect the house from <br />6 disrepair. The deck is a safety hazard. There is no intention to remove the house. <br />7 <br />8 Ayes: 6 <br />9 Nays: 1 (Bakeman) <br />10 Motion carried 6-1. <br />11 <br />12 <br />