pf_03540 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 Extract from Draft Planning Commission Minutes of December 3, 2003 meeting: 6a. Planninl?: File 3540: Request by Jim Badzinski for a Variance to Section 1016.16A (Placement of Structures on Lots), 1016.16B1 (additional Structure Standards for all Districts), and 1016.22C3 (Non-conformities) of the Roseville City Code to allow the replacement and expansion of a deck within the required shoreland setback and bluff impact zone, on property located at 381 South Owasso Boulevard. Chair Mulder opened the hearing and requested the City Planner present a verbal summary of the staff report dated December 3,2003. Thomas Paschke (City Planner) indicated the staff recommended approval of a modified deck proposal based on the findings in the project report dated December 3,2003, and contingent upon applicant's compliance with the following conditions: a. The deck being a maximum size of 12 feet by 12 feet. b. The property owner locating and identifying in the field the top of bluff on the parcel for use by the City in detenl1ining the required setback. c. The deck having a minimum setback of 12 feet from the top of bluff. d. The deck having a minimum setback of 36 feet from the ordinmy high watermark. e. The deck must remain an open-air deck - in the future no enclosure of this deck as a screen porch or expanded living area to the principal structure will be permitted. f. Shrubs and perennials must be planted between the bluff and the deck to screen the deck and provide a visual enhancement. Member Stone asked if there were watershed issues (no, but the MnDNR will be reviewing the application prior to a Council action). Member Peper asked if the deck could be 16 feet wide but only 12 feet towards the lake. Thomas Paschke explained some neighbor concerns and l2'xI2' would have less impact on the edge of the bluff. Mr. Badzinski, owner who lives next door, noted the existing deck is an eye sore and unsafe. He would accept a 12'xI2' deck as proposed by the staff. Member Bakeman asked how long it has been owned by applicant (1.5 years). What other improvements have or are being done? (New garage new basement, interior remodeling). No comments were offered from the public. Chair Mulder closed the hearing. Motion: Member Peper moved, seconded by Member Traynor, to recommend approval of a 39 foot Variance to Section 10l6.16A (Placement of Structures on Lots), a Variance to Section 1016.16Bl (Additional Structure Standards for All Districts), and a 18 foot Variance to Section 10l6.22C3 (Nonconformities) of the Roseville City Code, to allow a 12 foot by 12 foot deck to the home at 381 Owasso Boulevard South, based on the findings of Section 5 and conditions of Section 6 of the project report dated December 3,2003.