My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03540
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3500
>
pf_03540
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 2:06:18 PM
Creation date
6/29/2005 1:20:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3540
Planning Files - Type
Variance
Address
385 S OWASSO BLVD W
Project Name
JAMES P BADZINSKI
Applicant
JAMES P BADZINSKI
Status
Approved
PIN
012923210003
Date Final City Council Action
12/15/2003
Date Final Planning Commission Action
12/3/2003
Additional Information
ATTACHED DECK
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />WHEREAS, The Roseville Planning Commission held the public hearing regarding the <br />Badzinski request on December 3, 2003, recommending (6-1) approval of a VARIANCE to <br />Section 10 16.16B 1 of the Roseville City Code, based on the findings of Section 5 and conditions <br />of Section 6 of the project report dated December 3,2003; <br /> <br />NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Roseville City Council, to APPROVE a <br />VARIANCE to Section 1016.16B1 of the Roseville City Code for Jim Badzinske, 381 South <br />Owasso Boulevard, subject to the following conditions; <br /> <br />a. The deck being a maximum size of 12 feet by 16 feet. <br /> <br />b. The property owner locating and identifying in the field the top of bluff on the <br />parcel for use by the City in determining the required setback. <br /> <br />c. The deck having a minimum setback of 12 feet from the top of bluff. <br /> <br />d. The deck having a minimum setback of 36 feet from the ordinary high watermark. <br /> <br />e. The deck must remain an open-air deck - in the future no enclosure of this deck <br />as a screen porch or expanded living area to the principal structure will be <br />permitted. <br /> <br />f. Shrubs and perennials must be planted between the bluff and the deck to screen <br />the deck and provide a visual enhancement. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council <br />Member Kough and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: Kough, <br />Maschka, Klausing, Schroeder, Kysylyczyn <br /> <br />and the following voted against: None <br /> <br />WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.