My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03458
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3400
>
pf_03458
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 2:12:06 PM
Creation date
6/30/2005 11:33:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3458
Planning Files - Type
Conditional Use Permit
Address
750 COUNTY ROAD C W
Project Name
EDWARD C & SARA L ANDERSON
Applicant
EDWARD C & SARA L ANDERSON
Status
Non-Active
PIN
112923120025
Additional Information
ACCESSORY BUILDING
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Community Development Departlnent <br />651-490-2279 . fax: 651-490-2931 <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />Section 1004.0 lA6 (Location) reads: "No accessory building or garden shed shall be erected <br />or located within the front yard. Accessory buildings and/or a garden shed shall be located <br />behind the established front building line of the principal structure." Any proposed detached <br />structure would be required to be located at or behind the current principal structure. <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />Section 1004.0lAlO (I-Ieight) reads: Accessory buildings shall not exceed one story or 15 feet <br />in height and the building wall height shall not exceed 9 feet in height. The overall height of an <br />accessory building shall not exceed the overall height of the principal structure." In the case of <br />the proposed accessory structure, it is unclear what the wall height is, only that the building has <br />a ceiling height of 13' -6". However, it does appear that the height of the proposed accessory <br />building would exceed the 15 foot maximum height and be required to receive a variance. <br /> <br />Based on my analysis of your proposal, your submitted application is incomplete. As well that <br />application was absent the required narrative and fees. With that said, should you desire to continue <br />the process, please complete the enclosed variance application, note the Code Sections (from above <br />analysis) you feel are applicable to your request, and submit a detailed site plan, narrative, and fees. <br /> <br />The variance process will require your request to meet the "hardship" criteria explained on the <br />application. Specifically, the ten11 "hardship" or "undue hardship" typically refers to physical <br />characteristics of the property, such as shape, soil conditions, or extreme topography. Neither mere <br />inconvenience, nor reduction in value alone, is sufficient to justify a variance. The inability to put <br />property to its highest and best use is not considered a hardship or practical difficulty. The problem <br />that justifies the variance must be caused by conditions beyond the control of the applicant. The <br />applicant cannot create the condition that requires the variance. <br /> <br />Should you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 651-490-2236. <br /> <br />Regards, <br />./''/ <br />C(,TY pfROSEVILLE <br /> <br />.<:~:::...~ <br /> <br />Thomas Paschke <br />City Planner <br /> <br />cc: PF3458 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.