pf_03459 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

5.6 Requiring the Beans to construct a detached garage or a double deep attached garage is not a reasonable solution and would reduce the livability of the structure and create added . . ImpervIOUS coverage. 5.7 In the past, Staff has reviewed and forwarded to the Commission and Council a number of front yard and/or exception variance requests, including Meade, 388 South McCarrons Boulevard, 16.5 feet 13.5 foot variance; Graham, 671 Shryer Avenue, 28 feet - 12 foot variance; Wilson, 31 07 West Owasso Boulevard, 17 feet - 13 foot variance; and Vazquez, 812 Lovell Avenue, 22.5 feet - 7.5 foot variance. All of these variance requests were supported by the Planning Commission and City Council, with the Graham request being the most similar to the Bean request. 5.8 Section 1013.02 states: Where there are practical difficulties or unusual hardships in the way of carrying out the strict letter of the provisions of this code, the city council shall have the power, in a specific case and after notice and public hearings, to vary any such provision in harmony with the general purpose and intent thereof and may impose such additional conditions as it considers necessary so that the public health, safety, and general welfare may be secured and substantial justice done. 5.9 State Statute 462.357, subd. 6 (2) provides authority for the city to "hear requests for variances from the literal provisions of the ordinance in instances where their strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and to grant such variances only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. "Undue hardship" as used in connection with the granting of a variance means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls, the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance....The board or governing body as the case may be may impose conditions in the granting of variances to insure compliance and to protect" 5.10 Staff analysis of undue hardship factors is as follows: A. The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls: The Bean home, given its current configuration and location on the parcel, is unable to expand outward (increased footprint) without receiving approval of two variances. Requiring a detached garage with a long driveway or a double loaded single stall attached garage, still with a narrow width, are not reasonable options. The Community Development Staff has determined that the property can be made more livable and put to a reasonable use under the official controls if a variance is l,!ranted. PF3459 - ReA 042803 - Page 4 of 6