pf_03459 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

1 1) Sets precedent for long variances - all except one house is set back 40 2 feet. 3 2) Disrupt good neighborly relations. 4 3) Change the character of the neighborhood - no house ( except one) has a 5 garage in front. 6 4) Blocks the line of sight down the street. 7 5) Blocks the sunlight through the windows along the south side he added a 8 car port to allow sun into the bathroom windows. 9 6) Will block southerly breezes. 10 7) Drainage will be affected along north property line with no slope. 11 8) Existing trees will be two feet from eves of garage - trees would have to 12 be sheared along my property line. 13 9) Mold is located in his house - he is concerned about condensation, kept in 14 check by sunlight and breeze as well as ridge vents. 15 10) This is a very large addition, too close to his property line, too tall. 16 11) Options for Beans, according to Mr. Grunthner: 17 a) move 18 b) construct a detached garage 19 c) construct a double deep garage on south side 20 d) add a "turn out" in the front yard 21 e) leave "as is". 22 He encouraged adherence to the City Code. He explained (via photo) how his south 23 bedroom window, front door, and yard would look with the variance. He is concerned 24 about livability of house if variance is approved. 25 26 There being no further comment; Chair Duncan closed the hearing. 27 28 Chair Duncan asked if a hardship is created on adjacent property is this enough to deny a 29 variance. Thomas Paschke explained that each case must be reviewed on its own. The 30 improvements, over time, will occur. 31 32 Member Bakeman asked for standard size of a garage (usually 22' x 24' or more). Does 33 the shed in the rear yard stay in the proposal? (yes) 34 35 Member Mulder asked if a fence could be place along the property line. (yes, to front of 36 building - 6.5 feet) 37 38 Member Mulder asked who owned the trees along the property line. (neighbor) Could 39 the City require replanting along the north property line? (Yes) 40 41 Motion: Member Mulder moved, seconded by Member Peper, to recommend 42 approval of the request by Brian Bean for a 24 foot VARIANCE to Section 43 1004.01E (Exception) and Section 1004.02DS (Yard Requirements - Side Yard 44 Setback) of the Roseville City Code allowing construction of living area and an 45 attached garage at 1760 Dunlap Street, based on the findings in Section 5 and 46 conditions of Section 6 of the project report dated April 2, 2003, with additional