My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03406
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3400
>
pf_03406
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 2:15:55 PM
Creation date
7/8/2005 3:09:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3406
Planning Files - Type
Setback Permit
Address
1812 Dale Court North
Project Name
Garvin, Tim
Applicant
Garvin, Tim
Status
Approved
PIN
142923410064
Additional Information
6' into require 10' side yard setback
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e. The existing improvements along with the proposed improvement retain a <br />minimum of 70% pervious surface and green space of the lot - YES; I have <br />estimated that the covered deck will create a total impervious area on <br />the site of 2,212 square feet, well below estimated impervious area <br />allowed or 4,320 square feet. <br /> <br />f. The proposed project creates no other setback or variance condition - IT <br />DOES NOT. <br /> <br />g. The proposed project improves the aesthetics, covered storage, or the <br />functional use of the site - YES; the proposed covered deck creates an <br />aesthetic feature that is functional. <br /> <br />h. The proposed project uses the same exterior materials and colors as the <br />principal structure - YES; though not identified, the roof shingles and <br />any siding/ fascial soffit, will need to match or be of similar <br />color/ style/type. <br /> <br />1. The final building mass is consistent with that on contiguous properties - <br />YES; the mass of this home with deck and porch is consistent with <br />other structures in direct proximity. <br /> <br />J. The building or driveway expansion/addition does not place more vehicles <br />adjacent to living quarters first floor bedrooms of adjacent homeowners - <br />DOES NOT APPLY. <br /> <br />k. The drainage and roof gutters guide water away from the structure and <br />adjacent structures - YES; this is a standard condition that is required to <br />eliminate any potential for drainage problems to occur. <br /> <br />1. The roof is properly proportioned to and integrated with the roof of the <br />principal structure (dwelling) on the property - Yes; based on the plans the <br />proposed roof achieved this requirement. <br /> <br />1. John Huppertz, 2465 Churchill Street. <br /> <br />I have reviewed the purpose and intent of the Setback Permit process and <br />determined that: <br /> <br />a. One car garage or less is located on the site - NO; and existing two car <br />age garage lies in the rear yard. <br /> <br />b. The proposed project improves the design and livability of the structure - <br />YES; the proposed change in location of the garage, detached to <br />attached and the addition of a mud room and other living space would <br />allow/afford the applicant/ structure greater/improved livability. <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.