My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03406
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3400
>
pf_03406
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 2:15:55 PM
Creation date
7/8/2005 3:09:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3406
Planning Files - Type
Setback Permit
Address
1812 Dale Court North
Project Name
Garvin, Tim
Applicant
Garvin, Tim
Status
Approved
PIN
142923410064
Additional Information
6' into require 10' side yard setback
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />c. The proposed project improves the terrain or a drainage issue - DOES <br />NOT APPLY; in my review it appears no drainage issues exist; <br />however, the proposal could create better overland drainage to <br />Churchill Street via the side yard. <br /> <br />d. The original reason or need for the setback permit was not created by the <br />current owner - NO; The DRC has struggled with this site condition in <br />the past; however, the applicant is creating the need for the setback <br />permit. <br /> <br />e. The existing improvements along with the proposed improvement retain a <br />minimum of 70% pervious surface and green space of the lot - NO; it is <br />estimated that the proposal, including the proposed pool, will create <br />lot coverage of 36%. <br /> <br />f. The proposed project creates no other setback or variance condition - YES; <br />a variance will be necessary for lot coverage. The current parcel is <br />already at the maximum 30% afforded by the code. The proposal is <br />estimated at 36%. <br /> <br />g. The proposed project improves the aesthetics, covered storage, or the <br />functional use of the site - YES; the proposal to attach the garage, create <br />a mud room, additional bathroom, refurbished kitchen and a new <br />family room meet/ address each of these conditions. <br /> <br />h. The proposed project uses the same exterior materials and colors as the <br />principal structure - YES; this proposed project will enhance the exterior <br />building materials and provide a new exterior for the whole home and <br />attached garage. <br /> <br />1. The final building mass is consistent with that on contiguous properties - <br />YES/NO; the proposal may be somewhat out of mass with others in <br />direct proximity; however, the proposal is consistent with previous <br />approvals. <br /> <br />J. The building or driveway expansion/addition does not place more vehicles <br />adjacent to living quarters first floor bedrooms of adjacent homeowners - <br />INCOMPLETE INFORMATION; though it does not appear to be <br />adjacent a bedroom. <br /> <br />k. The drainage and roof gutters guide water away from the structure and <br />adjacent structures - YES; this is a standard condition that is required to <br />eliminate any potential for drainage problems to occur. <br /> <br />1. The roof is properly proportioned to and integrated with the roof of the principal <br />structure (dwelling) on the property - Yes; based on the plans the proposed roof <br />achieved this requirement. <br /> <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.