My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03407
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3400
>
pf_03407
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 2:15:59 PM
Creation date
7/8/2005 3:15:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3407
Planning Files - Type
Variance
Address
2465 Churchill Street
Project Name
Huppertz, John and Julie
Applicant
Huppertz, John and Julie
Status
Approved
PIN
112923230021
Date Final City Council Action
7/29/2002
Additional Information
app'd w/conditions
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e. The existing improvements along with the proposed improvement retain a <br />minimum of 70% pervious surface and green space of the lot YES; I have <br />estimated that the covered deck will create a total impervious area on <br />the site of 2,212 square feet, well below estimated impervious area <br />allowed or 4,320 square feet. <br /> <br />f. The proposed project creates no other setback or variance condition - IT <br />DOES NOT. <br /> <br />g. The proposed project improves the aesthetics, covered storage, or the <br />functional use of the site - YES; the proposed covered deck creates an <br />aesthetic feature that is functional. <br /> <br />h. The proposed project uses the same exterior materials and colors as the <br />principal structure - YES; though not identified, the roof shingles and <br />any siding/ fascial soffit, will need to match or be of similar <br />color/ style/type. <br /> <br />1. The final building mass is consistent with that on contiguous properties - <br />YES; the mass of this home with deck and porch is consistent with <br />other structures in direct proximity. <br /> <br />J. The building or driveway expansion/ addition does not place more vehicles <br />adjacent to living quarters first floor bedrooms of adjacent homeowners - <br />DOES NOT APPLY. <br /> <br />k. The drainage and roof gutters guide water away from the structure and <br />adjacent structures - YES; this is a standard condition that is required to <br />eliminate any potential for drainage problems to occur. <br /> <br />1. The roof is properly proportioned to and integrated with the roof of the <br />principal structure (dwelling) on the property - Yes; based on the plans the <br />proposed roof achieved this requirement. <br /> <br />1. John Huppertz, 2465 Churchill Street. <br /> <br />I have reviewed the purpose and intent of the Setback Permit process and <br />determined that: <br /> <br />a. One car garage or less is located on the site - NO; and existing two car <br />age garage lies in the rear yard. <br /> <br />b. The proposed project improves the design and livability of the structure - <br />YES; the proposed change in location of the garage, detached to <br />attached and the addition of a mud room and other living space would <br />allow / afford the applicant/ structure greater/improved livability. <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.