My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_03407
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF3000 - PF3801
>
3400
>
pf_03407
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 2:15:59 PM
Creation date
7/8/2005 3:15:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
3407
Planning Files - Type
Variance
Address
2465 Churchill Street
Project Name
Huppertz, John and Julie
Applicant
Huppertz, John and Julie
Status
Approved
PIN
112923230021
Date Final City Council Action
7/29/2002
Additional Information
app'd w/conditions
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />c. The proposed project improves the terrain or a drainage issue - DOES <br />NOT APPLY; in my review it appears no drainage issues exist; <br />however, the proposal could create better overland drainage to <br />Churchill Street via the side yard. <br /> <br />d. The original reason or need for the setback permit was not created by the <br />current owner - NO; The DRC has struggled with this site condition in <br />the past; however, the applicant is creating the need for the setback <br />permit. <br /> <br />e. The existing improvements along with the proposed improvement retain a <br />minimum of 70% pervious surface and green space of the lot - NO; it is <br />estimated that the proposal, including the proposed pool, will create <br />lot coverage of 36%. <br /> <br />f. The proposed project creates no other setback or variance condition - YES; <br />a variance will be necessary for lot coverage. The current parcel is <br />already at the maximum 30% afforded by the code. The proposal is <br />estimated at 36%. <br /> <br />g. The proposed project improves the aesthetics, covered storage, or the <br />functional use of the site - YES; the proposal to attach the garage, create <br />a mud room, additional bathroom, refurbished kitchen and a new <br />family room meet/ address each of these conditions. <br /> <br />h. The proposed project uses the same exterior materials and colors as the <br />principal structure - YES; this proposed project will enhance the exterior <br />building materials and provide a new exterior for the whole home and <br />attached garage. <br /> <br />1. The final building mass is consistent with that on contiguous properties - <br />YES/NO; the proposal may be somewhat out of mass with others in <br />direct proximity; however, the proposal is consistent with previous <br />approvals. <br /> <br />J. The building or driveway expansion/ addition does not place more vehicles <br />adjacent to living quarters first floor bedrooms of adjacent homeowners - <br />INCOMPLETE INFORMATION; though it does not appear to be <br />adjacent a bedroom. <br /> <br />k. The drainage and roof gutters guide water away from the structure and <br />adjacent structures - YES; this is a standard condition that is required to <br />eliminate any potential for drainage problems to occur. <br /> <br />1. The roof is properly proportioned to and integrated with the roof of the principal <br />structure (dwelling) on the property - Yes; based on the plans the proposed roof <br />achieved this requirement. <br /> <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.