Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, December 8,2014 <br /> Page 36 <br /> Mr. Culver concurred, noting that in addition, funding options would still need to <br /> be finalized, with staff returning with that information as part of a feasibility <br /> study, with any ordering of the project beyond that, and subsequent action of the <br /> City Council for funding and ordering the project. <br /> Councilmember Willmus advised that, before he could support construction of a <br /> roadway, he would want an updated traffic study, and asked for more discussion <br /> on how and where that fit into this process. <br /> Mr. Culver advised that staff had sought updated numbers that were generated in <br /> early November as part of the feasibility study working with SRF for other Twin <br /> Lakes area improvements, including updated numbers on Fairview Avenue and <br /> County Road D to answer questions since WalMart had opened. Mr. Culver dis- <br /> played and reviewed how to interpret those preliminary numbers, noting that <br /> some additional updating would be required on some roadways immediately adja- <br /> cent to this Phase II of Twin Lakes Parkway. Those preliminary numbers as dis- <br /> played are made a part of the RCA, Traffic counts were for the existing road(s), <br /> 2030 projected traffic projections not based on the full model but with current <br /> traffic volumes and land use development to-date, including the proposed apart- <br /> ment buildings and with consideration given to improvements programmed on I- <br /> 694 and likely improvements for the I-35W managed lane occurring along this ar- <br /> ea. Mr. Culver clarified that there were other factors driving traffic in this area <br /> that were beyond the Walmart development. <br /> Taking all that into consideration, Mr. Culver reviewed Fairview Avenue as an <br /> example of current traffic volumes,projected volume in 2030 and increases or de- <br /> creases projected, and how that minor County arterial roadway would manage <br /> traffic with further development in the area. Mr. Culver further reviewed impacts <br /> to County Road D. Overall, Mr. Culver highlighted where ADT's were actually <br /> lower in some cases for 2030 than originally projected in the 2007 AUAR. <br /> Councilmember Willmus questioned whether there would be other infrastructure <br /> improvements indicated along Fairview Avenue with an updated traffic study and <br /> modeling. <br /> Mr. Culver responded that there would be, noting that the 2007 AUAR had al- <br /> ready identified them, clarifying that even though the document had expired, it <br /> was still used for informational purposes in helping to determine needed im- <br /> provements (e.g. traffic signals) as the area builds out. Mr. Culver advised that <br /> this included coordinating with Ramsey County and other agencies to fund those <br /> improvements as well. <br /> Councilmember McGehee reiterated her previous comments; and opined that <br /> whether or not Parks & Recreation Director Brokke chose to call that area park- <br /> land or not, more than any other Councilmember at the bench, she had spent more <br />