Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, November 17, 2014 <br />Page 5 <br />(11ounciln-teniber WilInvus noted that a CorrinlUnity Center was specifically and <br />separately identified in and thrOLIghOUI the Parks Master Plan process and SLIP_ <br />ported by the public for continue discussion and consideration. ouncilmember <br />Willmus noted that past diSCUssions had been primarily limited to potential part- <br />nership with Roseville Area Schools, art(] suggested such as partnership could still <br />be pursued, vdiether through land, space, or simply the long tradition, of working <br />cooperatively (e g• gymnastics center). ouncilmerriber Willmus expressed his <br />curiosity seeing how the new park buildings would fulfill the need and role for <br />gathering Spaces, and should prove an interesting component to the overall Picture <br />as they carne on line. fri monitoring that, and what was learned froin the Cities of <br />Shorevle%v and Maplewood, and their operating deficits, Couriciln-tember Willmus <br />opined that the public's comfbrt level could then be feather deten-mined. Coun- <br />cilmerriber Willrrius opined that, just like cornitiunity centers in other cities, the <br />need to determine the public's willingness to expend dollars f6r such a facility <br />was something that needed consideration, but cautioned that lie was, not yet ready <br />tura rush out and state that Clic City of"Roscvillc had to have a con,imunity center. <br />Councilmember Etten agreed that a combined effort by the City and School Dis- <br />trict could prove berieficial fi_,)r both patties, as well as the conimUnity; even <br />though it ineant there were more pcOplc involved who had to con -ie to an agree- <br />ment and work Out the details, such as where and when, which should be possible <br />with leaders working together as a whole. Councilmernber Etten noted that this <br />type of facility was substantially (Jifterctit than those being constructed in area <br />Parks, and as residents had recently asked hini, there remained a need for a facility <br />to rriect the needs froin little children to the elderly. While in agreement with <br />niany ofthe COMments made by his colleagues, Councilmember Etten opined that <br />lie was not readY to jump into the pool yet. <br />With recent financial obligations undertaker) by the City with Park Renewal FIro- <br />grain itnprovernents and bonding, as, well as utility acrd infrastructure irnprove- <br />rnCIIt Upgrades and costs, Mayor Roe opined that right now he had little interest in <br />adding anything additional for taxpayers, Flowever, Mayor Roe noted the con- <br />tinuing comments he heard from residents, about the things we still don't have in <br />the community frorn the standpoint of a C01111-11LItlity center, and therefore, it <br />seemed a reasonable approach was to, determine as tirnef'ranic when such a facility <br />would and could make sense (c,g_ if as local sales tax option was considered). <br />Mayor Roe suggested options, including how to ad�jUSI timing, should all be part <br />of the process; and to him, it seemed it was important to have key things in place <br />bel"ore moving forward, including the actual steps in the process, who t:c> talk to, <br />and when those preliminary conversations should occur. Mayor Roc suggested <br />that the Conni-nission move from the initial interest expressed by the community <br />in the Park Master Plan process as a starting point, including areas of" interest in <br />such a facility, and then seek further Feedback from the C01111TILinity to determine <br />their current level o C support in pursuing a COMMUrn ty center. Mayor Roe noted <br />