Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Aloeting <br />Wnday, November 17, 2014 <br />Page 7 <br />COUnCilmeniber Mc(.'jciiee stated that she found that financing between the <br />Maplewood and Shoreview community centers ivere very different; with the City <br />of Maplewoc)d offerinIg lifetinic memberships for initial contributors in building <br />the facility, and asked that options, such as that be included by the Commission as <br />well. <br />Cedarhoh'ii Golflo ' Li ' Current rse and ClUbhous - e <br />Chair Holt noted that the Cuent clubhouse had been placed on the site in the late <br />1950,'s, and had more than exceeded its USCfUl life, Chair Holt noted the need to <br />determine how to plan fror its replacement, as it seemed to be valued by the com- <br />munity. In consideration of the City's overall budgeting, Cbair Holt sought City <br />Council input on how they wanted the Commission to approach this major issue <br />and the information they wanted provided for their decision-making, whether the <br />Golf Course remained as all Enterprise Fund or was funded sirnflar to the OVAL <br />COUncilmeniber L.alibcrte opined that Cedarholm was allasset tri the C01-nInUnity, <br />while expressing varying degrees of willingness to pursue building ii facility or <br />making rnajor repairs on the existing buil(Jing given its age and condition, Coun- <br />cilmernber Laliberte expressed her interest in receiving the facilities utilization <br />data, age, and deniographics compared to state and national levels, whether pri- <br />V(,1te or public facilities. Councilmernber Laliberte recogmized the ebbs and flows <br />of" the Industry, 'but sought additional inforination on where the Golf Course was <br />on that bell cure Of Utilization compared tca other trends and natim.)nwidc utiliza- <br />tion. Moving forward, COUnCilmember Laliberte questioned if the Commission <br />would feel conifortable developing a plan for how to continue protnoting the fit- <br />cifity and expand or increase Use beyond the status quo. <br />COUnCilmember Me( eheL opined that shc considered this a capital ivarpra.rvcrrarcrnt <br />program (CIP) issue Vel -SUS an Enterprise Fund issue. Councilmember McGehee <br />expressed licr frustration with the Conirnission being fully aNvare of this need, as <br />well as that ofthe skating center, and not including those needs as part of the sub- <br />stantial amount of money allotted for CIP needs, but instead choosing to spend the <br />money elsewhere. Therefore, Councilmember McGeficc stated that she wasnt <br />feeling very gm-od about this Issue, since she felt good about the existing park fia- <br />cilities, and it was her Understanding that thOSe ffiCilit]CS WOUld be improved and <br />maintained; and further stated that site was hearing that from, the conimunity as <br />well, that the i-im facilitics being constructed were not what they had in mind ei- <br />ther. COU11cilmeniber McGelice sought infiormation on whether fees could be <br />raised at the golf course to make the operation sustainable; and recognizing that <br />the City of Edina recently closed a golf course, and not wanting that to happen <br />here, she supported it as a good course for young kids and the elderly in the com- <br />munity who were not serni-I,,)ros, but simply seeking a local community golf <br />course. Couricilmernber McGehee noted the desire of the public to see the course <br />wel I -in ai ritai tied, and questioned why one of the park buildings could not have <br />been located on the site to replace the club house and serve various f"Linctions. <br />