pf_01847 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

", e . . ,- e Plann~ng Offlce P.ours May 6, 1987 e Page 5 * Mr. Jan~sch revlcwed the proposed temporary structure, and d~scussed the need for meetlng the State bUlldlng' code reqUlrements. Holmes Freight has now reached an ~greement to lease office space ~ns~de of the bUlldlngj thHs~ the temporary bu~ld~ng is not need~d. ' , , 8. Kentucky Fr~ed Chicken El1.11 Saunders, the proposed developer of a Kentucky Fried Chlcken Sltc north of McDonald's, was 1n w1.th h1S arch1.tect to revl.CW the1.r proposed development. Although they had spoken earller of changing the wood shlngled roof design to metal stand1.ng r~D, they noted now that they are propos~ng to build lt w~th the shingles as orl.g~nally apPloved hy the Counc1l. They propose ~o move the trash conta1ner closer from near thc center of the property to the west edge. I suggested that thlS lS approprlate~ and wlll be less conspicuous than the previous locatlon. Thcy propose also to extend a cooler from the west end of the bUlld~ng. I noted that thlS could not be done unless it were enclosed within the structure, to be built ln exact confor- mance with the struC'c.ure and bUllding materlals orl',1l.nally approved. They agreed then to extend the bu~lding slightly to the west, and enclose the cooler, WhlCh will not be exposed to the exterlor. Ttis extenslon w~ll be done w~th the same br1ck walls as the structurc or~glnally approved. 9. Sclden 484-2698 Guy Selden l1.ves at 2374 Nancy Place, and was 1n with his contlguous neighbors, John and JaCkle Hochschieldt, who Ilve at 2380 Nancy Place. These folks have garages that ar~ approx1mately eight feet apart, and have a )Olnt drl.v~way. The Clty is rebu1ldlng the street ln front, and there 1S a problem w1th the w1dth of the Joint dr~veway~ which is t~~nty-three fect wide. The City's maxlmum is twenty-two feet w.lde. One ~pt1.on would be to put l.n a dlvlder b~~wecn the two drl.veways. However, if th1.S lS four or flve feet wide each of the drlveways w1.ll get pretty narrow. I suggested that the drlveways be reduced s~x inches on each slde to produce a twenty-two foot wldth for thelr Joint use, conforming to the C1.ty's maximum for a single dr~veway. I suggested that they apply for a mlnor varlance to allow the drlveways to be in jOlnt use contlguous to the common property llne. Mr. Janlsch 1ndlcated the procedures and requlrements for approvals. They propose then to a~ply for a mlnor var~ance on this basls, Wh1Ch seems to be . raasonable Solut1on to the problcm. '