pf_01525 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

PLARHING RRPOitT DATE: 1 August 1984 CASE NUMBER: 1525-84 APPLICANT: Saint Rose of Lima Church LOCATION: Northeast Quadrant of Ha=line Avenue and Skillman Avenue ACTION REQUESTED: Apprulal of Planned Unit Development Variance to Side Yard Setback PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 1. In general, the St. Rose of Lima Church folks propose to convert their existing convent to a parish administration center and rectory and convert he exi.ting rectory to convent purposes. Attached is a statement describing the changes propo~ed, and a site ;lan indicating the nature and location of these changes on the property. We have reviewed the proposal on .everal occasions with the staff, representatives of tne Church, and Tom Lynch, architect, of the firm Winsor and Fairey. Their program seem. 4 reaSONABLE AND practical one utilizing an existing structure (the convent) for which they have little usu in its present capacity becau.e of the extre=e reduction in the number of nuns houled on site. 2. The Church has a long bistory in Roseville. the school was built in 1949 and added to in 1954. they currently eperate grades K-8 with approximately 400 students. The Church was last expanded 15 yean ago. They have 322 parking spacel on site. The facility aerves approximately 2,700 families in their services area. 3. Because there .Ire a nulllber of principal structures on the site, the planned revisions should be processed as a Planned Unit Development for which a .pecial ule permit is re~uired. 4. South of the existing convent structure, they propose to remo~e an existing two car garage and construct a new three car garage. 'Ibis structure will be within six (6) feet of the east property line contiguous to an existing single fa=ily residence. Churches and convents are a per=itted use in the R-l D18trict, but with the stipulation that all structures be not less than 30 feet fr()(Q the property linp.. Thus, the variance i~ required in this case. As of this point, no detailed plans have been prepared indlcating a method of handhng this tranl'lieion frOlll the east side of the garage to) the contiguous residence. The Planning comlll.ission and Council may wish to consider adding a condition to any approval that a landscape p13n be prepared subject to staff approval, to adequately handle this transition. 5. the engineering staf( notes that the driveway for this new garage is pro?osed to be 25 feet in width. The ordinance limits driveways to residential properties to 22 feet in width.