My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01586
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1500-1599
>
pf_01586
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 2:18:51 PM
Creation date
7/22/2005 6:30:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1586
Planning Files - Type
Special Use Permit
Address
2360 LEXINGTON AVE N
Project Name
ROSE OF SHARON SECOND ADDITION
Applicant
YORKTON LIMITED
Status
Approved
Date Final City Council Action
5/13/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />CASE NUMBER: 1586-8~ <br />APPLICANT: Yorkton Limited <br /> <br />Page 11 <br /> <br />applicRnt would be assessed for his >rtIon of the frontage. <br />He has been informed of this conditi n and is not opposed to <br />this construction. ^ principal feature of the plan is, of <br />cour3e, that no access is pro ')sed off Jrandview Avenue, <br />thus minimizing the impact of the development upon the <br />contiguous residential property to the north of Grandvlew. <br /> <br />Mr. Lee has informed us t~at he has visited with the owners <br />of the single family homes to the OOt'til and informs us that <br />thero is considerable t1upport alllong these owners for the <br />proposed dev9lopment. You will note that the elderly <br />housing structure (northerly most building) Is located 70 <br />feet trom the south right-of-way line of Grandview Avenue. <br />The minimum setback required here would be 30 feet. <br />Theoretically, the not.therly 70 feet of the property could <br />be lett in the single tamily zone, though this would require <br />a variance to the sotback (to this zoning line) and a <br />further variance to the density requirements. <br /> <br />Such a strip of land zoned R-l would provide some protection <br />to the neighbors to the north in the event the land is <br />rezoned, but the project is not buUt. All of the land <br />ha.ving been Indicated on the Comprehensi ve Plan as high <br />density multi-family housing, however, justifies the <br />rezoning of the property as proposed. The Planning <br />Commission and Council, however, lIIay wish to consider the <br />zoning not taking eftect until construction proceeds. <br /> <br />10. The staff has met with the developer and its consultant a <br />number ot times in the past two months. He has been most <br />cooperative in considering the statr recommendations. <br />Though there might be minor alterations and design details, <br />it would appear that the proposed structures and site <br />development will function well, and be an attractive <br />addition to the community at a highly exposed location <br />within the City. <br /> <br />11. The proposal then includes a re~uest tor action on the <br />following: <br /> <br />a. Rezoning from R-1 to R~3 for the northerly 110 feet <br /> <br />b. Approval 01' d Planned Unit Development for the entire <br />site (subject to the ~~zoning of the southwesterly 0.91 <br />acre site) <br /> <br />c. Approval of a Special Use Permit for the Planned Unit <br />Development and the day care center. <br /> <br />d. Approval of the variance to density and parking <br />requirements. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.