Laserfiche WebLink
<br />r <br /> <br />Case Number: 958-76 <br />March 3, 1976 <br /> <br />Page Four <br /> <br />This may account for the apparent lack of need fOl' parkIng 10 the area. <br />W suggest that the approval of the planned unIt development accommodatIng <br />the garden center and the 1,400 square foot greenhouse addItIon 1S a <br />reasonable course under the planne~ unlt developMent procdure <br /> <br />9. Appro\al of thIS des1gn as a planned unit development does not constItute <br />the cstablish~~nt of the garden center a~ a separate site. As a planned <br />unit development, the garden center 1S a permanent part of the shopping <br />ce~ter and cannot be $old to a separate owner w1th a separate operation. <br />Thus, the circulation and par~lng faCIlitIes are permanently establIShed <br />as a joint use between the garden center and the shopplng center, itsel~. <br />