Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.' <br /> <br />.p <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />PLANNING REPORT <br /> <br />DATE I <br /> <br />7 March 19B4 <br /> <br />CASE NUMBER I <br /> <br />1482-84 <br /> <br />APPLICANT I <br /> <br />1.1 vin Kehr <br /> <br />LOCATIOi'll <br /> <br />SOuth of COW'lty Road C, \featly at Dale <br />Street <br /> <br />ActION REQUESTED I <br /> <br />Approval of Ruoning from R-l to R-2 <br />Special UIe Permit for Pliul"l~ unit <br />Dev410plllent <br />prelbdnary Plat <br />Variance to Denlity Requirement. <br /> <br />PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS, <br /> <br />1. The planning COl:IllIisa1on at iu l..t me"t:!ng adjourn&d the hlaring on thb <br />prop:llal !r0lll the reqular Febr~ry :Aaeting t") the 7 March _eting JO ae <br />to give the applicant time to =iti9~te what appearld to be three ~rincl~~~ <br />areas of concCU'n. On. of thue 11 the apparent oppoaitlon on the part <br />of at least lome of the neighbors to the developlllp..e and tht. rezoning. <br />The .econd il tho statu. of the reciprocal ealem.nt. that would a..ilt in <br />alauring the int.nt of Lhe owner. to the CA.t to Ultimately extend the <br />roadway to tale Street. The third is the pro'/ision for an acceptable <br />turn-around facility for fire fighting apparatu.. Acc..sery to t~ <br />later is the quo3t1on of the aidnq of the water fl\&iM in the development <br />.0 a. to as lure appropriate pre. lure for fire fiqhtinq apparatus. Thi. <br />que.tion can be left in the handa of the Public WOrks Director who w111 <br />lize the facility for whatever i. needed. <br /> <br />2. We have suggelted to the .~~licAnt at the .taff =eating. at City Hall, that: <br />he addre.. tht'lle c.;\ncorn. ..~ ~:.a\. the Plallning CoIllIIIi..ion an4 Council will <br />have an oppor~unity to ~dequAtely review the re.ult., and arrive at an <br />objective dlci.i~n. In pdt'ticular, we suggQ.ted that he meet with the Fire <br />Chief ~ a~ t~ produce a technical design solution to the apparatus turn- <br />around. <br /> <br />3. NE!GHBORHOOD CONCERNS <br /> <br />The appl1:ant hat stated to the staff that all of the neighbors to the east <br />agree to the solution and d~slre that the road ultimately be extended to <br />DAle Street. Obviously, this would be in tho economic interest of thOle <br />~rtiQs, inacmuch AS it would provide what aFP~ars to be th& best .olution <br />for the ultimate development of thele very dee~ lots, some 40, feet in <br />depth. These propety owners and the land they own is illustrated on an <br />attached .ketch whlCh we have prepared indicating the future extenlion of <br />the roadway. Support for the propc.sal wau not charly expreued at the <br />meeting, and perrap8 this can be clarified at the M4rch hearing. It se~ <br />apprOftiate to e=phasize this point because the three property owners <br />