pf_01482 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

" e . CASE NUMBER; APPLICANT; 1482-84 Alvin Kehr Page 2 involved in this case are essential to the ultimate land use decision on the total land ult1=ately to be developed. The moat direct opposition w~! ~xpre8sed in the for.m of a letter from Mu. l.elen Smith Bua.. 11 cop)- of her letter b attached. We have 'U9gested to Mr. Kehr that he contact her and perhaps suggest that sh. could have rights to the roadway to be constructed just easterly of her property, and that the .outherly portion of her lot could be 1eve1oped with additional ~~ouse units using his roadway for acces.. Har lot has a depth of 100 feet off this road which wwuld be adequate for the development of similar townhouse unit.. 11 similar solution coul~ be evolved for the property to the Ye~t, each of ~hich adjoin the access road to the American Legion Club. 4. !lOADW1l Y EASEMENT We have suqgested to Mr. Kehr that reciprocal eASeII\entll be arran9ed now .0 as to more fully alaure the Planninq Commi.sion and Council that the roadway will, in fact, be exterAed in the relatively nenr future. Obviously, such easementt are not neceSSAry until the rOadway is constructed, but sur~ly it YOuld increase the liklihood of it happening if the owners could agree at this point. The only ease:uent that 'lOuld appear to be euentil\l at this point is that Mr. Xehr give easement rights over hi, road at this time to the three property owners involved, so that at such tilllO a8 they chose to proceed, they will have already established right. to connect to and ~ravel acro.. the roadway on Mr. Kehr'. property. ThuI, if the project is ultimately approved, the condition should be thAt easements be granted to the affected property owner. on the part of the applicant. and possibly Mrs. Bus. as well. s. CUL-04::-SJ\C 'I'URN-AROIDiD The normal solution for a turn-around at the end of a cul-d.-sac in the case of a public street is the rroviaion for a 60 foot diameter ri9ht-of-way, with a ~o foot diameter r~adway within it. An alternative that haa been used .;1S a temporary condition in the past, is t'1e provision for a 30 foot by 30 foot ri~ht-of-way on either side of the end of the stub street. With a 60 foot wide r~9ht-of-way, this producec a HT" turn-aroun~ area that LS 100 feet by 30 feet in width. This is the solution that was used for the temporary cul-de-sacs at the end of H~ron, Dellwood, and Merrill streets in south central RoBevi'l~. Ultimately, these turn-arounds were not needed when these atreets were extended, and connected by Ruggles Dtreet. Such a 't- shaped turn-^rouod ~ould be provided on this development, but its north-south dimension would be approximately eo feet due to the narrower width of the ro~dway in this case. The applicant in this case has dlscuss~d this issue wlth the "Building Code~ and ~tandard. O..vision" of the State of Minnesota Departlllent of