|
<br />, ~. ..,' ,
<br />I.f ~
<br />(~r} ~.. .
<br />
<br />"
<br />
<br />j .
<br />t
<br />+
<br />
<br />~<-.
<br />)-;, '~
<br />
<br />t' -l,.,\-'
<br />
<br />~
<br />
<br />, ,
<br />." /
<br />i,
<br />"
<br />ir ~(~
<br />'^~ ~ -
<br />~...."~ ~
<br />-: ,r ~ '
<br />r, ^
<br />.. ,
<br />~~: '
<br />1: ,>
<br />.
<br />(,
<br />~ .
<br />}
<br />,
<br /><
<br />~
<br />,
<br />
<br />, '
<br />> '
<br />[.
<br />
<br />~
<br />"
<br />~
<br />>
<br />,..
<br />r~.-""
<br /><'
<br />+
<br />~ ,~'"
<br />.
<br />~
<br />r
<br />
<br />"
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />--
<br />
<br />e-
<br />
<br />February 4, 1970
<br />
<br />CASE NO.:
<br />
<br />564-70
<br />
<br />APPLICANT:
<br />
<br />Mort J. Hvber
<br />5901 West Bald Eagle Boulevard, St. Paul, Minn.
<br />
<br />lOCATION:
<br />
<br />South of County Rood B, West of Dole Street
<br />
<br />ACTION REQUESTED:
<br />
<br />Rezoning from R2 to R3a and Bl to B3
<br />
<br />PLANN ING CO N SIDE RA TlONS:
<br />
<br />1. M,st of the property in question, os you will note on the ~etch at the left,
<br />is now zoned 83, with a portion of the lond immediately in front 'If the e)ustlng
<br />Huber Sign Company's operation zoned B1. To the west is an area of land
<br />zoned R2, with a single lot to. the for west zoned RI. The property In question
<br />has been zoned commerdal for 0 long time, predating the 1959 zoning, and
<br />has been occupied by the Huber SJgn Company, who u~s the ex.l$tmg structures
<br />for the manufacture of signs. The remai{lder of the property hos been utilized
<br />as a landfill operation for ~me time. Recently, the Village of Roseville
<br />approved the development of 0 service station at the southwest corner of County
<br />Rood B and Dale Street. This service station, you will recall, was of Q rather
<br />good design, with the service space oriented to the reor, which was to be con-
<br />structed by the Murphy Oil Compony. The applicant now prapo~s to dl
<br />the remainder of the property.
<br />
<br />2.
<br />
<br />On the westerly portion of the property, the applicart propo~s to construct
<br />042 unit apartment buildi"fl on the land currently zoned R2. The construction
<br />of a 39 unit aportment building IS automotically ponible under the section of
<br />the ordlnanco establishing transitional uses contiguous to busll'less zones. thE"
<br />ordinance states that where land is zoned single~amily and IS next to a bUSiness,
<br />o duplex mo} be built. The ordinance also ~ates that on lend thot is zoned
<br />R2 and is located next to 0 business zone, an apartment may be built. We have
<br />suggested to the applicant,1n prior conferences, that it would be more appropriate
<br />to add three cdditio"lOl units to the apartment rether than attempt to place a single
<br />family home on the Jot to the for west side of the propelty. The total lend area
<br />required far the apartment unit ( 24 one-bedroom units and 18 two-bedroom units),
<br />would be 8 J , 600 lq. ft. The total in land area is 9] ,927 sq. ft. You will note,
<br />on the development plan, that the access to the opaltment structure is enllrelf
<br />off or County Rood B, and there is on underground gal age under I he apartment
<br />accommod::lting one parking space pCI unit.
<br />
<br />~ ~ ,,,- l ;..
<br />
<br />l
<br />
<br />"
<br />
<br />{
<br />,
<br />1
<br />
<br />~
<br />.
<br />
|