pf_00564 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I.. [ r:- \. , . . .... .. .. Ft!bruary 4, 1970 CASE NO.: 5M-70 APPLICANT: Mort J. Huber 5901 West Bold Eagle Boulevard, St. Paul, Minn. lOCATION: South of County Road 8, West of Dale Street ACTION REQUESTED: Rezoning from R2 to R3a and 81 to 83 PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: I. Most of the proper.! in ques~ion, as you will f"Ae on the sketch ot the left, is now zoned 83, with a portion of Ihe lard immediately in front of the existirg Huber Sign Company's operation zoned 81. To the west is gn area of land zoned R2, with a single lot to. the f~H west zoned RI. The properlY in question has been ;;;oned commercial for a long time, predating th" 1959 z,ming, cnd hcs bcen occupied by the Hvber Sign Company, who uses the exisHng structures for the manufacture of signs. The remai{lder of ~he poperty has been utilized os a landfill operation for SOme time. Recently, the Village of Roseville approved the development of 0 servic:e \tetion at ihe southwest corner of County Road B and Dole Street. This service station, you will recall, was of a relher good design, with the service space oriented to the rear, which was to be <:on- strueted by tho Murphy Oil Company. The cp~licanl now proposes to develop the remainder of the property. 2. On the westerly portion of the prOpelt)', If>-; opplicort proposes to construct a 42 unit apartment building on fhe land currently zoned R2. The construction cf a 39 unit apartment building is automatically possible under the section of the ordinance establishing transitional uses contiguous to bUSiness zones. The ordinance sl':ltes that where land is zoned single.{c:mily and is r~:d to c bUSIness, o duplex may be built. The ordinance also states that un lond that is zoned R2 and is loc~ted next to a business zone, On apartment may be built. We have su9geued to the applic.ont,in prior conferences, that it would be more appropriate to odd three additional units to the apartment rather than attempt to place a Single family home on the lot to the For welot Side of the property. The total land area required for the apartment unit ( 24 one4bcdro:>m units cnd I B two-bedroom unilS), would be 81,600 sq. fr. The total in land orca is 91,927 sq. ft. You will note, on the development plan, thot the occ:e~s to the Opal tment ~tructure IS entnely off of County Rood a, and there i~ cn underground go. age under the apartment a<:commodoting one parking space pCI unit. ~ } ~ '1 ',. . ~ ~ x , : , . , ) .1 ,