pf_00564 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

:.: e . ,\ . . -- February 4, 1970 CASE NO.: 564-70 APPLICANT: 11 lo.t J. Huber 5',01 West Bald Eagle Boulevard, St. Paul, Minn. lOCATION: ~uth of Co:.mly Rood B, "/est of Dale Street ACTION REQUESTED: ~zonin9 from R2 to R30 and 81 to 83 PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 1. Most of the property in que~tion, as you will note on the sketch at the leh, is row zoned 83, ....ith a portion of the lord immediately in front of the existing Huber Sign Corilpony'~ operation zoned 81. To the west is an are<:J of land :toned R2, with a ~in9le lot to lhe for west zoned Rl. The property in question has been zoned commercial for 0 long time, predating the 1959 zoning, and has been occupied by the Bober Sign Company, who uses the existing structures for the manufacture of signs. The remainder of the property has been utili::ed as a landfill operation for some time. Recently, the Village of Roseville approved the development of 0 service station at the southwe$l corner of County Rood 8 and Dale Street. This service station, yo\.! will recall, was of a rather good design, with the service ~pace oriented to the rear, which was to be con- structed by the Murphy Oil Company. The applicant now proposes to d~ve'op the rt'mainder of the property. 2. On the westerly portion of the property, the opplicort propases to construct o 42 unit apartment building on the land currently zoned R2. The construction of a 39 unit apartment build:ng h automatically possible under the section of the ordinonce establi~hin9 tran~itional uses contiguous to bUSiness zones. The ordinance states that whele land iszoned single-family and is next to a business, o duplex may be built. The ordmance olso stotes that on land that IS zoned R2 ::Ind is located next to 0 busine~~ zone, an apartment may be bui It. We hove suggested to the cpplicant,in prio, conferences, that it would be IT.ore appropriate to odd three additional vnlts to the aportment lather than attempt to place 0 single family home on the lot to the for west side of the propelty. The totol land area required for the apartment unit ( 24 onc-bcdloom units and 18 two-bedroom unils), would be 81,600 sq ft. The total in land area is 91,927 sq. ft. You will note, on the development plcn, thot the o'ce~s to the apartment structure is entirely off of County Rood B, and thele is on underglound garage under the opartment accommodating one patld'1g space per unll ~ . '. ~ ,\ .!. > \ , . , ~ , .' ; ,: t