Laserfiche WebLink
<br />5.4 Section 602.06 (Parking on Boulevard Prohibited) reads: No vehicle shall be parked on <br />any boulevard adjacent to a public street except for boulevard parking spaces listed on <br />the inventory of boulevard parking spaces regularly in use, dated June 30, 1984, prepared <br />by the code enforcement officer, a copy of which is incorporated herein by reference and <br />which is on file in the office of the city manager, may continue to be used until one of the <br />following occurs: <br /> <br />A. Roadway improvements involving disturbance of or removal of the boulevard <br />parking area is undertaken; or <br /> <br />B. Substantial improvements to the lot located adjacent to the boulevard parking area <br />is undertaken, such expansion or construction of house, garage or driveway (Ord. <br />1223,6-29-1999). <br /> <br />5.5 Based on the proposal by Mr. Strub, a variance is necessary to Section 602.06 because <br />there will not be adequate depth (20 feet) behind the property line to allow vehicle <br />parking on the driveway. Notwithstanding, staff has determined that a condition must be <br />placed on this proposal to ensure that vehicle parking is limited to inside the accessory <br />structure, due to the close proximity to the public right-of-way and street. <br /> <br />5.6 Section 1013.02 states: Where there are practical difficulties or unusual hardships in the <br />way of carrying out the strict letter of the provisions of this code, the city council shall <br />have the power, in a specific case and after notice and public hearings, to vary any such <br />provision in harmony with the general purpose and intent thereof and may impose such <br />additional conditions as it considers necessary so that the public health, safety, and <br />general welfare may be secured and substantial justice done. <br /> <br />5.7 State Statute 462.357, subd. 6 (2) provides authority for the city to "hear requests for <br />variances from the literal provisions of the ordinance in instances where their strict <br />enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the <br />individual property under consideration, and to grant such variances only when it is <br />demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the <br />ordinance. "Undue hardship" as used in connection with the granting of a variance <br />means the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions <br />allowed by the official controls, the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances <br />unique to the property not created by the landowner, and the variance, if granted, will not <br />alter the essential character of the locality. Economic considerations alone shall not <br />constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of <br />the ordinance....The board or governing body as the case may be may impose conditions <br />in the granting of variances to insure compliance and to protect" <br /> <br />PF3426 - ReA 102102 - Page 3 of6 <br />