Laserfiche WebLink
<br />the lot size; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, said addition would encroach 6 feet into the required 30 foot rear <br />yard setback; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the dining room addition requires a 4% (339 sq. ft) variance to Section <br />1004.01A6 of the Roseville City Code; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, said addition also requires 6 foot variance to Section 1004.02D5 of the <br />Roseville City Code; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Roseville Planning Commission held the public hearing regarding the <br />Seal variance requests on November 6,2002, and recommended (7-0) approval of the request, <br />based on findings outlined in Section 5 and conditions of Section 6 of the proj ect report dated <br />November 6, 2002. <br /> <br />NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Roseville City Council, to grant John <br />and Martha Seal a 4% impervious coverage variance (339 sq. f1.) to Section 1004.01A6 and a 6 <br />foot rear yard variance to Section 1004.02D5 and of the Roseville City Code to allow the <br />addition of a dining room, for property at 3110 Evelyn Street, based on the findings in Section 5 <br />and of the project report dated November 18,2002 and subject to the following conditions: <br /> <br />a. All building and site improvements shall not exceed 3,054 square feet of <br />. . <br />ImpervIOUS area. <br /> <br />b. Exposing the rear yard comer pins (lot comers) to verify the approved setback of <br />24 feet (6 foot encroachment). <br /> <br />c. The dining room addition being limited to a 16 foot extension of the existing <br />principal structure, as indicated on the plans. <br /> <br />d. The review and approval of a building permit consistent with the approved plans <br />and variance. <br /> <br />e. The installation of roof gutters along the southern side to properly direct roof <br />drainage away from the adjacent property. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council <br />Member Schroeder and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: Schroeder, <br />Kough, Maschka, Klausing, Kysylyczyn <br /> <br />and the following voted against: None <br /> <br />WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br /> <br />2 <br />