Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,January 5, 2015 <br /> Page 10 <br /> and returning with their recommendations for potential implementation, providing <br /> information on any problem areas, or asking questions of any items on the list(s). <br /> Under that scenario, Councilmember McGehee suggested it would show how the <br /> group could work together on those collective goals and priorities, providing a <br /> framework for the community to respond to and give input. <br /> Councilmember McGehee spoke in support of the current community survey pro- <br /> cess and continuing that to remain on track. Councilmember McGehee opined <br /> that the main thing seemed to be identifying how the five individual Coun- <br /> cilmembers established priorities and how to move forward with consensus <br /> among the group with an understanding from staff of those goals and priorities. <br /> Mayor Roe stated that he didn't disagree with any of the comments made by his <br /> colleagues, reiterating that this retreat and process was intended for the City <br /> Council and staff, and was not intended to change the community's vision, but to <br /> better and systematically reflect the vision of the community. Mayor Roe noted <br /> that everything done by the City Council was within the public's purview, and <br /> what the City Council, as Roseville's Board of Directors, did over the next few <br /> years was open to comment. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that the proposed process from Mr. Rapp provided the impetus <br /> for tonight's discussion with something to react to, and suggested that if further <br /> conversation was needed or a different process than proposed, those discussions <br /> continue. Mayor Roe noted that Mr. Rapp's proposal provided for development <br /> of 5-6 priorities or goals everyone could agree on, and involved the participation <br /> in both parts of the process by the City Council and City staff, with key outcomes <br /> and targets identified, followed by an implementation discussion providing key <br /> outcomes and targets. Mayor Roe noted that, whether or not the agreed-upon <br /> process for this strategic planning was similar to that proposed by Mr. Rapp or <br /> not, something needed to be decided, and this was simply one attempt to accom- <br /> plish that. <br /> Mayor Roe advised that he had spoken to a City of New Brighton Councilmem- <br /> ber, since that city had used the services of Mr. Rapp for the last two years, and <br /> advised that their comment had been that Mr. Rapp did a good job of gathering in- <br /> formation and guiding discussion. However, Mayor Roe noted that the comments <br /> were prefaced on the fact that Mr. Rapp came from the perspective of staff and <br /> from a long-time City Manager background, and therefore did not provide the <br /> same bias as an elected official, even though overall they seemed to be happy <br /> with his services in the role of facilitator. Mayor Roe opined the elected official <br /> the City Council brought that perspective and bias to the table. <br /> Councilmember Willmus noted that the process described by Mayor Roe, and as <br /> presented in these materials, was not unlike the process used by the HRA, and of- <br /> fered his support of the retreat going forward. However, in recognizing that oth- <br />